# TEC: A Collection of Human Trial-and-error Trajectories for Problem Solving

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06734 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06734/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09332/) (2021)
- [Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05176/) (2025)
- [Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06070/) (2023)
- [GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12983/) (2023)
- [BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12516/) (2025)
- [WebVoyager: Building an End-to-End Web Agent with Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13919/) (2024)
- [WebWalker: Benchmarking LLMs in Web Traversal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07572/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Open-Domain Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06984/) (2023)
- [Agent-R: Training Language Model Agents to Reflect via Iterative Self-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.11425/) (2025)
- [S2R: Teaching LLMs to Self-verify and Self-correct via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12853/) (2025)
- [TripClick: The Log Files of a Large Health Web Search Engine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07901/) (2021)
- [MAR:Multi-Agent Reflexion Improves Reasoning Abilities in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.20845/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Trial-and-error is a fundamental strategy for humans to solve complex problems and a necessary capability for Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems operating in real-world environments. Although several trial-and-error AI techniques have recently been proposed, most of them rely on simple heuristics designed by researchers and achieve limited performance gains. The core issue is the absence of appropriate data: current models cannot learn from detailed records of how humans actually conduct trial-and-error in practice. To address this gap, we introduce a data annotation platform and a corresponding dataset, termed Trial-and-Error Collection (TEC). The platform records users' complete trajectories across multiple trials and collects their reflections after receiving error feedback. Using this platform, we record the problem-solving processes of 46 participants on 58 tasks, resulting in 5,370 trial trajectories along with error reflections across 41,229 webpages. With this dataset, we observe that humans achieve substantially higher accuracy compared to LLMs, which demonstrates that humans are more effective in trial-and-error than LLMs. We believe that the TEC platform and dataset provide a valuable foundation for understanding human trial-and-error behavior and for developing more capable AI systems. Platform and dataset are publicly available.