# Fine-tuning Whisper for Pashto ASR: strategies and scale

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06507 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06507/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 9 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04356/) (2022)
- [Multistage Fine-tuning Strategies for Automatic Speech Recognition in Low-resource Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04573/) (2024)
- [Whispering in Amharic: Fine-tuning Whisper for Low-resource Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18485/) (2025)
- [Benchmarking Multilingual Speech Models on Pashto: Zero-Shot ASR, Script Failure, and Cross-Domain Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.04598/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Pashto is absent from Whisper's pre-training corpus despite being one of CommonVoice's largest language collections, leaving off-the-shelf models unusable: all Whisper sizes output Arabic, Dari, or Urdu script on Pashto audio, achieving word error rates above 100%. We compare four fine-tuning strategies for whisper-base on CommonVoice Pashto v20: vanilla full fine-tuning, LoRA (rank 64), frozen-encoder (2/6 layers), and multistage Urdu-to-Pashto transfer. We extend vanilla fine-tuning to whisper-small and whisper-large-v3-turbo on CommonVoice Pashto v24 (113 hours). Vanilla fine-tuning achieves WER 21.22% on CV20, outperforming LoRA by 33.36 pp, frozen-encoder by 14.76 pp, and Urdu transfer by 44.56 pp. Frozen-encoder fine-tuning degrades performance on whisper-base (6 encoder layers): layer-function separation does not hold at this depth, and freezing removes a third of trainable capacity. Urdu-to-Pashto transfer fails due to an unverified intermediate checkpoint, phonological mismatch, and insufficient training. On CV24, whisper-small achieves WER 24.89% (2.24 pp over whisper-base at 3.3x parameters); whisper-large-v3-turbo achieves 23.37% (a further 1.52 pp). Diminishing returns indicate whisper-small is the practical optimum at 113 hours. Online augmentation provides 7.25 pp WER benefit over matched training. Error analysis identifies word-final suffix confusion (masculine -ay vs. feminine -a) and retroflex substitutions involving the Pashto-unique consonant /ts/ as dominant failure modes. Fine-tuned checkpoints and evaluation scripts are released on HuggingFace.