# Visual prompting reimagined: The power of the Activation Prompts

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06440 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06440/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 68 of its 105 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 68)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.03167/) (2015)
- [Layer Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06450/) (2016)
- [Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00190/) (2021)
- [Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01134/) (2021)
- [Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13586/) (2021)
- [Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraft](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1306.5151/) (2013)
- [Visual Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12119/) (2022)
- [EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.00029/) (2017)
- [CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.06890/) (2016)
- [Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08731/) (2019)
- [BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.10199/) (2021)
- [SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00774/) (2023)
- [An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02080/) (2021)
- [Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.04366/) (2021)
- [Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Art](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.00121/) (2017)
- [Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07677/) (2022)
- [AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13535/) (2022)
- [Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05796/) (2017)
- [What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15661/) (2022)
- [Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.08810/) (2021)
- [Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04647/) (2021)
- [AdapterHub: A Framework for Adapting Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.07779/) (2020)
- [A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.04867/) (2019)
- [Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03962/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Transformers Learn the Optimal DDPM Denoiser for Multi-Token GMMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.10074/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Visual prompting (VP) has emerged as a popular method to repurpose pretrained vision models for adaptation to downstream tasks. Unlike conventional model fine-tuning techniques, VP introduces a universal perturbation directly into the input data to facilitate task-specific fine-tuning rather than modifying model parameters. However, there exists a noticeable performance gap between VP and conventional fine-tuning methods, highlighting an unexplored realm in theory and practice to understand and advance the input-level VP to reduce its current performance gap. Towards this end, we introduce a generalized concept, termed activation prompt (AP), which extends the scope of the input-level VP by enabling universal perturbations to be applied to activation maps within the intermediate layers of the model. By using AP to revisit the problem of VP and employing it as an analytical tool, we demonstrate the intrinsic limitations of VP in both performance and efficiency, revealing why input-level prompting may lack effectiveness compared to AP, which exhibits a model-dependent layer preference. We show that AP is closely related to normalization tuning in convolutional neural networks and vision transformers, although each model type has distinct layer preferences for prompting. We also theoretically elucidate the rationale behind such a preference by analyzing global features across layers. Through extensive experiments across 29 datasets and various model architectures, we provide a comprehensive performance analysis of AP, comparing it with VP and parameter-efficient fine-tuning baselines. Our results demonstrate AP's superiority in both accuracy and efficiency, considering factors such as time, parameters, memory usage, and throughput.