# SELFDOUBT: Uncertainty Quantification for Reasoning LLMs via the Hedge-to-Verify Ratio

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06389 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06389/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 22 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05221/) (2022)
- [MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01574/) (2024)
- [Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09261/) (2022)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03216/) (2024)
- [Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09664/) (2023)
- [Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14975/) (2023)
- [Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15927/) (2024)
- [MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16049/) (2023)
- [Reasoning Models Better Express Their Confidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14489/) (2025)
- [Latent Space Chain-of-Embedding Enables Output-free LLM Self-Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13640/) (2024)
- [Understanding the Uncertainty of LLM Explanations: A Perspective Based on Reasoning Topology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17026/) (2025)
- [CoT-UQ: Improving Response-wise Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs with Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17214/) (2025)
- [Semantic Volume: Quantifying and Detecting both External and Internal Uncertainty in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.21239/) (2025)
- [Trace Length is a Simple Uncertainty Signal in Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10409/) (2025)
- [Geometric Uncertainty for Detecting and Correcting Hallucinations in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13813/) (2025)
- [Read Your Own Mind: Reasoning Helps Surface Self-Confidence Signals in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23845/) (2025)
- [Learned Hallucination Detection in Black-Box LLMs using Token-level Entropy Production Rate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.04492/) (2025)
- [Lexical Hints of Accuracy in LLM Reasoning Chains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.15842/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [TrAC: Trace-Conditioned Answer Consistency for Efficient Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00422/) (2026)
- [Confidently Wrong, Silently So: Auditing Undetectable Failures of a Deployed On-Device Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.23663/) (2026)
- [Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents: A Taxonomy, an Evaluation Protocol, and an Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.07395/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Uncertainty estimation for reasoning language models remains difficult to deploy in practice: sampling-based methods are computationally expensive, while common single-pass proxies such as verbalized confidence or trace length are often inconsistent across models. This problem is compounded for proprietary reasoning APIs that expose neither logits nor intermediate token probabilities, leaving practitioners with no reliable uncertainty signal at inference time. We propose SELFDOUBT, a single-pass uncertainty framework that resolves this impasse by extracting behavioral signals directly from the reasoning trace itself. Our key signal, the Hedge-to-Verify Ratio (HVR), detects whether a reasoning trace contains uncertainty markers and, if so, whether they are offset by explicit selfchecking behavior. Unlike methods that require multiple sampled traces or model internals, SELFDOUBT operates on a single observed reasoning trajectory, making it suitable for latency- and cost-constrained deployment over any proprietary API. We evaluate SELFDOUBT across seven models and three multi-step reasoning benchmarks (BBH, GPQA-Diamond, and MMLU-Pro). Most notably, traces containing no hedging markers are correct 96% of the time, revealing an emergent high-precision confidence gate at zero additional cost. For the remaining cases, the full SELFDOUBT score significantly outperforms sampling-based semantic entropy at 10x lower inference cost. A deployment cascade combining both stages attains 90% accuracy at 71% coverage without any task-specific labels. These results establish SELFDOUBT as a scalable, production-ready foundation for uncertainty estimation over proprietary reasoning models.