# Joint Knowledge Base Completion and Question Answering by Combining Large Language Models and Small Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.05875 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05875/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.5602/) (2013)
- [Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11416/) (2022)
- [DecAF: Joint Decoding of Answers and Logical Forms for Question Answering over Knowledge Bases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.00063/) (2022)
- [Beyond Chains: Bridging Large Language Models and Knowledge Bases in Complex Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14099/) (2025)
- [DiagLink: A Dual-User Diagnostic Assistance System by Synergizing Experts with LLMs and Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.20311/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Boosting Knowledge Graph Foundation Models via Enhanced Negative Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.27023/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Knowledge Bases (KBs) play a key role in various applications. As two representative KB-related tasks, knowledge base completion (KBC) and knowledge base question answering (KBQA) are closely related and inherently complementary with each other. Thus, it will be beneficial to solve the task of joint KBC and KBQA to make them reinforce each other. However, existing studies usually rely on the small language model (SLM) to enhance them jointly, and the large language model (LLM)'s strong reasoning ability is ignored. In this paper, by combining the strengths of the LLM with the SLM, we propose a novel framework JCQL, which can make these two tasks enhance each other in an iterative manner. To make KBC enhance KBQA, we augment the LLM agent-based KBQA model's reasoning paths by incorporating an SLM-trained KBC model as an action of the agent, alleviating the LLM's hallucination and high computational costs issue in KBQA. To make KBQA enhance KBC, we incrementally fine-tune the KBC model by leveraging KBQA's reasoning paths as its supplementary training data, improving the ability of the SLM in KBC. Extensive experiments over two public benchmark data sets demonstrate that JCQL surpasses all baselines for both KBC and KBQA tasks.