# Adversarial Robustness Analysis of Cloud-Assisted Autonomous Driving Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04349 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.04349/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving.
- Builds on 7 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- End-to-end autonomous driving / [Adversarial scenarios and safety testing](https://mlsanity.com/driving/adversarial-scenarios-and-safety-testing/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [MetaDrive: Composing Diverse Driving Scenarios for Generalizable Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.12674/) (2021)
- [Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00401/) (2021)
- ["Real Attackers Don't Compute Gradients": Bridging the Gap Between Adversarial ML Research and Practice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.14315/) (2022)
- [Leveraging Cloud Computing to Make Autonomous Vehicles Safer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03204/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Small-Scale Testbeds for Connected and Automated Vehicles and Robot Swarms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.14199/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous vehicles increasingly rely on deep learning-based perception and control, which impose substantial computational demands. Cloud-assisted architectures offload these functions to remote servers, enabling enhanced perception and coordinated decision-making through the Internet of Vehicles (IoV). However, this paradigm introduces cross-layer vulnerabilities, where adversarial manipulation of perception models and network impairments in the vehicle-cloud link can jointly undermine safety-critical autonomy. This paper presents a hardware-in-the-loop IoV testbed that integrates real-time perception, control, and communication to evaluate such vulnerabilities in cloud-assisted autonomous driving. A YOLOv8-based object detector deployed on the cloud is subjected to whitebox adversarial attacks using the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD), while network adversaries induce delay and packet loss in the vehicle-cloud loop. Results show that adversarial perturbations significantly degrade perception performance, with PGD reducing detection precision and recall from 0.73 and 0.68 in the clean baseline to 0.22 and 0.15 at epsilon= 0.04. Network delays of 150-250 ms, corresponding to transient losses of approximately 3-4 frames, and packet loss rates of 0.5-5 % further destabilize closed-loop control, leading to delayed actuation and rule violations. These findings highlight the need for cross-layer resilience in cloud-assisted autonomous driving systems.