# RL-Driven Sustainable Land-Use Allocation for the Lake Malawi Basin

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03768 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03768/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL for energy, networks and operations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 2 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL for energy, networks and operations](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-for-energy-networks-and-operations/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [A Closer Look at Invalid Action Masking in Policy Gradient Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14171/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Unsustainable land-use practices in ecologically sensitive regions threaten biodiversity, water resources, and the livelihoods of millions. This paper presents a deep reinforcement learning (RL) framework for optimizing land-use allocation in the Lake Malawi Basin to maximize total ecosystem service value (ESV). Drawing on the benefit transfer methodology of Costanza et al., we assign biome-specific ESV coefficients -- locally anchored to a Malawi wetland valuation -- to nine land-cover classes derived from Sentinel-2 imagery. The RL environment models a 50x50 cell grid at 500m resolution, where a Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) agent with action masking iteratively transfers land-use pixels between modifiable classes. The reward function combines per-cell ecological value with spatial coherence objectives: contiguity bonuses for ecologically connected land-use patches (forest, cropland, built area etc.) and buffer zone penalties for high-impact development adjacent to water bodies. We evaluate the framework across three scenarios: (i) pure ESV maximization, (ii) ESV with spatial reward shaping, and (iii) a regenerative agriculture policy scenario. Results demonstrate that the agent effectively learns to increase total ESV; that spatial reward shaping successfully steers allocations toward ecologically sound patterns, including homogeneous land-use clustering and slight forest consolidation near water bodies; and that the framework responds meaningfully to policy parameter changes, establishing its utility as a scenario-analysis tool for environmental planning.