# Selective Forgetting for Large Reasoning Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03571 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03571/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 11 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)
- LLM safety and security / [Machine unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/safety/machine-unlearning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07805/) (2020)
- [TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06121/) (2024)
- [Large Language Model Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10683/) (2023)
- [HuatuoGPT-o1, Towards Medical Complex Reasoning with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18925/) (2024)
- [SafeChain: Safety of Language Models with Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12025/) (2025)
- [Continual Learning and Private Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12817/) (2022)
- [Effectively Controlling Reasoning Models through Thinking Intervention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.24370/) (2025)
- [When Machine Unlearning Meets Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Keep Secret or Forget Knowledge?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15267/) (2024)
- [R-TOFU: Unlearning in Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15214/) (2025)
- [Towards Benchmarking Privacy Vulnerabilities in Selective Forgetting with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.18035/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) generate structured chains of thought (CoTs) before producing final answers, making them especially vulnerable to knowledge leakage through intermediate reasoning steps. Yet, the memorization of sensitive information in the training data such as copyrighted and private content has led to ethical and legal concerns. To address these issues, selective forgetting (also known as machine unlearning) has emerged as a potential remedy for LRMs. However, existing unlearning methods primarily target final answers and may degrade the overall reasoning ability of LRMs after forgetting. Additionally, directly applying unlearning on the entire CoTs could degrade the general reasoning capabilities. The key challenge for LRM unlearning lies in achieving precise unlearning of targeted knowledge while preserving the integrity of general reasoning capabilities. To bridge this gap, we in this paper propose a novel LRM unlearning framework that selectively removes sensitive reasoning components while preserving general reasoning capabilities. Our approach leverages multiple LLMs with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to analyze CoT traces, identify forget-relevant segments, and replace them with benign placeholders that maintain logical structure. We also introduce a new feature replacement unlearning loss for LRMs, which can simultaneously suppress the probability of generating forgotten content while reinforcing structurally valid replacements. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and medical datasets verify the desired properties of our proposed method.