# Beyond Precision: Importance-Aware Recall for Factuality Evaluation in Long-Form LLM Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03141 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03141/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 18 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14251/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01313/) (2024)
- [Long-form factuality in large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.18802/) (2024)
- [VERISCORE: Evaluating the factuality of verifiable claims in long-form text generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19276/) (2024)
- [A Closer Look at Claim Decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11903/) (2024)
- [Long2RAG: Evaluating Long-Context & Long-Form Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Key Point Recall](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.23000/) (2024)
- [Beyond Factual Accuracy: Evaluating Coverage of Diverse Factual Information in Long-form Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.03545/) (2025)
- [VeriFact: Enhancing Long-Form Factuality Evaluation with Refined Fact Extraction and Reference Facts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09701/) (2025)
- [CLATTER: Comprehensive Entailment Reasoning for Hallucination Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05243/) (2025)
- [All Claims Are Equal, but Some Claims Are More Equal Than Others: Importance-Sensitive Factuality Evaluation of LLM Generations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07083/) (2025)
- [MedScore: Generalizable Factuality Evaluation of Free-Form Medical Answers by Domain-adapted Claim Decomposition and Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18452/) (2025)
- [Comprehensiveness Metrics for Automatic Evaluation of Factual Recall in Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07926/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Two-Level Meta-Rubrics for Evaluating Open-Ended Generation: GAMUT, a Benchmark for Factual Completeness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.19322/) (2026)
- [Skill-based Agentic Evaluation for Real-time Data Science Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.16487/) (2026)
- [A Proposed Rubric for Evaluating Expressed Clinical Reasoning in Large Language Model Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37788/) (2026)
- [A rubric landscape for evaluating clinical reasoning in large language models: what exists, what is missing, and what needs to be combined](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01938/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating the factuality of long-form output generated by large language models (LLMs) remains challenging, particularly when responses are open-ended and contain many fine-grained factual statements. Existing evaluation methods primarily focus on precision: they decompose a response into atomic claims and verify each claim against external knowledge sources such as Wikipedia. However, this overlooks an equally important dimension of factuality: recall, whether the generated response covers the relevant facts that should be included. We propose a comprehensive factuality evaluation framework that jointly measures precision and recall. Our method leverages external knowledge sources to construct reference facts and determine whether they are captured in generated text. We further introduce an importance-aware weighting scheme based on relevance and salience. Our analysis reveals that current LLMs perform substantially better on precision than on recall, suggesting that factual incompleteness remains a major limitation of long-form generation and that models are generally better at covering highly important facts than the full set of relevant facts.