# Agentic-MME: What Agentic Capability Really Brings to Multimodal Intelligence?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03016 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03016/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 35 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Embodied and 3D vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/embodied-and-3d-vision-language-models/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Multimodal and embodied agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/multimodal-and-embodied-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06070/) (2023)
- [MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02490/) (2023)
- [HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Face](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17580/) (2023)
- [SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16125/) (2023)
- [Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02276/) (2026)
- [DeepEyes: Incentivizing "Thinking with Images" via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14362/) (2025)
- [Thinking with Images for Multimodal Reasoning: Foundations, Methods, and Future Frontiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23918/) (2025)
- [Thyme: Think Beyond Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.11630/) (2025)
- [DeepEyesV2: Toward Agentic Multimodal Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.05271/) (2025)
- [Mini-o3: Scaling Up Reasoning Patterns and Interaction Turns for Visual Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.07969/) (2025)
- [MMSearch: Benchmarking the Potential of Large Models as Multi-modal Search Engines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12959/) (2024)
- [Monet: Reasoning in Latent Visual Space Beyond Images and Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21395/) (2025)
- [GTA: A Benchmark for General Tool Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08713/) (2024)
- [Zooming without Zooming: Region-to-Image Distillation for Fine-Grained Multimodal Perception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11858/) (2026)
- [MM-BrowseComp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13186/) (2025)
- [DeepMMSearch-R1: Empowering Multimodal LLMs in Multimodal Web Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.12801/) (2025)
- [m&m's: A Benchmark to Evaluate Tool-Use for multi-step multi-modal Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11085/) (2024)
- [MMSearch-Plus: Benchmarking Provenance-Aware Search for Multimodal Browsing Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.21475/) (2025)
- [Vision-DeepResearch: Incentivizing DeepResearch Capability in Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.22060/) (2026)
- [TIR-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Agentic Thinking-with-Images Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01833/) (2025)
- [Vision-DeepResearch Benchmark: Rethinking Visual and Textual Search for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02185/) (2026)
- [RealUnify: Do Unified Models Truly Benefit from Unification? A Comprehensive Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24897/) (2025)
- [Gaia2: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Dynamic and Asynchronous Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11964/) (2026)
- [Mavors: Multi-granularity Video Representation for Multimodal Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10068/) (2025)
- [Beyond Seeing: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs on Tool-Enabled Image Perception, Transformation, and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.12712/) (2025)
- [Skywork-R1V4: Toward Agentic Multimodal Intelligence through Interleaved Thinking with Images and DeepResearch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02395/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [ToolCUA: Towards Optimal GUI-Tool Path Orchestration for Computer Use Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12481/) (2026)
- [Where Do Deep-Research Agents Go Wrong? Span-Level Error Localization in Agent Trajectories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.02060/) (2026)
- [Self-Evolving Code-with-Image Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.11292/) (2026)
- [VLM-in-Sandbox: Visual Workspaces for Agentic Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.24362/) (2026)
- [VideoResearchAgent: Grounded Task Synthesis and Sim-to-Real RL for Open-Web Video Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.04911/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are evolving from passive observers into active agents, solving problems through Visual Expansion (invoking visual tools) and Knowledge Expansion (open-web search). However, existing evaluations fall short: they lack flexible tool integration, test visual and search tools separately, and evaluate primarily by final answers. Consequently, they cannot verify if tools were actually invoked, applied correctly, or used efficiently. To address this, we introduce Agentic-MME, a process-verified benchmark for Multimodal Agentic Capabilities. It contains 418 real-world tasks across 6 domains and 3 difficulty levels to evaluate capability synergy, featuring over 2,000 stepwise checkpoints that average 10+ person-hours of manual annotation per task. Each task includes a unified evaluation framework supporting sandboxed code and APIs, alongside a human reference trajectory annotated with stepwise checkpoints along dual-axis: S-axis and V-axis. To enable true process-level verification, we audit fine-grained intermediate states rather than just final answers, and quantify efficiency via an overthinking metric relative to human trajectories. Experimental results show the best model, Gemini3-pro, achieves 56.3% overall accuracy, which falls significantly to 23.0% on Level-3 tasks, underscoring the difficulty of real-world multimodal agentic problem solving.