# Diagnosing Translated Benchmarks: An Automated Quality Assurance Study of the EU20 Benchmark Suite

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01957 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.01957/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 27 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.04672/) (2022)
- [COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.09025/) (2020)
- [XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.05053/) (2018)
- [On the Cross-lingual Transferability of Monolingual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.11856/) (2019)
- [TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.05002/) (2020)
- [MLQA: Evaluating Cross-lingual Extractive Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.07475/) (2019)
- [XCOPA: A Multilingual Dataset for Causal Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00333/) (2020)
- [xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10482/) (2023)
- [PAWS-X: A Cross-lingual Adversarial Dataset for Paraphrase Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.11828/) (2019)
- [Generating Training Data with Language Models: Towards Zero-Shot Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04538/) (2022)
- [Global MMLU: Understanding and Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Biases in Multilingual Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03304/) (2024)
- [GEMBA-MQM: Detecting Translation Quality Error Spans with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13988/) (2023)
- [Scaling up COMETKIWI: Unbabel-IST 2023 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11925/) (2023)
- [Mapping global dynamics of benchmark creation and saturation in artificial intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.04592/) (2022)
- [Error Span Annotation: A Balanced Approach for Human Evaluation of Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11580/) (2024)
- [CroissantLLM: A Truly Bilingual French-English Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00786/) (2024)
- [Towards Multilingual LLM Evaluation for European Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08928/) (2024)
- [NorBench -- A Benchmark for Norwegian Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03880/) (2023)
- [Spanish and LLM Benchmarks: is MMLU Lost in Translation?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17789/) (2024)
- [Plutus: Benchmarking Large Language Models in Low-Resource Greek Finance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18772/) (2025)
- [BenCzechMark : A Czech-centric Multitask and Multimetric Benchmark for Large Language Models with Duel Scoring Mechanism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17933/) (2024)
- [Evalita-LLM: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Italian](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02289/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Machine-translated benchmark datasets reduce costs and offer scale, but noise, loss of structure, and uneven quality weaken confidence. What matters is not merely whether we can translate, but also whether we can measure and verify translation reliability at scale. We study translation quality in the EU20 benchmark suite, which comprises five established benchmarks translated into 20 languages, via a three-step automated quality assurance approach: (i) a structural corpus audit with targeted fixes; (ii) quality profiling using a neural metric (COMET, reference-free and reference-based) with translation service comparisons (DeepL / ChatGPT / Google); and (iii) an LLM-based span-level translation error landscape. Trends are consistent: datasets with lower COMET scores exhibit a higher share of accuracy/mistranslation errors at span level (notably HellaSwag; ARC is comparatively clean). Reference-based COMET on MMLU against human-edited samples points in the same direction. We release cleaned/corrected versions of the EU20 datasets, and code for reproducibility. In sum, automated quality assurance offers practical, scalable indicators that help prioritize review -- complementing, not replacing, human gold standards.