# True (VIS) Lies: Analyzing How Generative AI Recognizes Intentionality, Rhetoric, and Misleadingness in Visualization Lies

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01181 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.01181/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Chart understanding and anomaly detection, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 21 of its 74 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Chart understanding and anomaly detection](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/chart-understanding-and-anomaly-detection/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05176/) (2025)
- [Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formatting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11324/) (2023)
- [LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave: Tackling Multi-image, Video, and 3D in Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.07895/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10302/) (2024)
- [Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02276/) (2026)
- [GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01006/) (2025)
- [Molmo and PixMo: Open Weights and Open Data for State-of-the-Art Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.17146/) (2024)
- [GTA1: GUI Test-time Scaling Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05791/) (2025)
- [Step-3 is Large yet Affordable: Model-system Co-design for Cost-effective Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19427/) (2025)
- [NVIDIA Nemotron Nano V2 VL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.03929/) (2025)
- [Probing the Visualization Literacy of Vision Language Models: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05445/) (2025)
- [Protecting multimodal large language models against misleading visualizations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.20503/) (2025)
- [The Perils of Chart Deception: How Misleading Visualizations Affect Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09716/) (2025)
- [Qianfan-VL: Domain-Enhanced Universal Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18189/) (2025)
- [V-RECS, a Low-Cost LLM4VIS Recommender with Explanations, Captioning and Suggestions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15259/) (2024)
- [Visualization for Villainy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.06007/) (2021)
- [How Persuasive Could LLMs Be? A First Study Combining Linguistic-Rhetorical Analysis and User Experiments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09614/) (2025)
- [The State of the Art in Visualization Literacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.01018/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study investigates the ability of multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) to identify and interpret misleading visualizations, and recognize these observations along with their underlying causes and potential intentionality. Our analysis leverages concepts from visualization rhetoric and a newly developed taxonomy of authorial intents as explanatory lenses. We formulated three research questions and addressed them experimentally using a dataset of 2,336 COVID-19-related tweets, half of which contain misleading visualizations, and supplemented it with real-world examples of perceptual, cognitive, and conceptual errors drawn from VisLies, the IEEE VIS community event dedicated to showcasing deceptive and misleading visualizations. To ensure broad coverage of the current LLM landscape, we evaluated 16 state-of-the-art models. Among them, 15 are open-weight models, spanning a wide range of model sizes, architectural families, and reasoning capabilities. The selection comprises small models, namely Nemotron-Nano-V2-VL (12B parameters), Mistral-Small-3.2 (24B), DeepSeek-VL2 (27B), Gemma3 (27B), and GTA1 (32B); medium-sized models, namely Qianfan-VL (70B), Molmo (72B), GLM-4.5V (108B), LLaVA-NeXT (110B), and Pixtral-Large (124B); and large models, namely Qwen3-VL (235B), InternVL3.5 (241B), Step3 (321B), Llama-4-Maverick (400B), and Kimi-K2.5 (1000B). In addition, we employed OpenAI GPT-5.4, a frontier proprietary model. To establish a human perspective on these tasks, we also conducted a user study with visualization experts to assess how people perceive rhetorical techniques and the authorial intentions behind the same misleading visualizations. This allows comparison between model and expert behavior, revealing similarities and differences that provide insights into where LLMs align with human judgment and where they diverge.