# Stochastic Dimension Implicit Functional Projections for Global Integral Conservation in High-Dimensional PINNs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29237 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.29237/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Hamiltonian Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01563/) (2019)
- [Differentiable Convex Optimization Layers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12430/) (2019)
- [Lagrangian Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.04630/) (2020)
- [Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11075/) (2019)
- [PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessian](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.07145/) (2019)
- [DC3: A learning method for optimization with hard constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.12225/) (2021)
- [Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01868/) (2024)
- [Neural Conservation Laws: A Divergence-Free Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01741/) (2022)
- [Physics-informed Autoencoders for Lyapunov-stable Fluid Flow Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10866/) (2019)
- [Self-Supervised Primal-Dual Learning for Constrained Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.09046/) (2022)
- [Efficient Learning of Generative Models via Finite-Difference Score Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.03317/) (2020)
- [Imposing Hard Constraints on Deep Networks: Promises and Limitations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02025/) (2017)
- [Physics and Equality Constrained Artificial Neural Networks: Application to Forward and Inverse Problems with Multi-fidelity Data Fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.14860/) (2021)
- [Enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Augmented Lagrangian Relaxation Method (AL-PINNs)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.01059/) (2022)
- [Universal Approximation Under Constraints is Possible with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.03303/) (2021)
- [HardNet: Hard-Constrained Neural Networks with Universal Approximation Guarantees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10807/) (2024)
- [RAYEN: Imposition of Hard Convex Constraints on Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.08336/) (2023)
- [Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Hard Linear Equality Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07251/) (2024)
- [Harnessing the Power of Neural Operators with Automatically Encoded Conservation Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11176/) (2023)
- [Learning Physics-Informed Neural Networks without Stacked Back-propagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.09340/) (2022)
- [Hutchinson Trace Estimation for High-Dimensional and High-Order Physics-Informed Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14499/) (2023)
- [Score-Based Physics-Informed Neural Networks for High-Dimensional Fokker-Planck Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07465/) (2024)
- [Stochastic Taylor Derivative Estimator: Efficient amortization for arbitrary differential operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.00088/) (2024)
- [Bias-Variance Trade-off in Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Randomized Smoothing for High-Dimensional PDEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.15283/) (2023)
- [ENFORCE: Nonlinear Constrained Learning with Adaptive-depth Neural Projection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06774/) (2025)
- [LinSATNet: The Positive Linear Satisfiability Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13917/) (2024)
- [Exactly conservative physics-informed neural networks and deep operator networks for dynamical systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.14131/) (2023)
- [GLinSAT: The General Linear Satisfiability Neural Network Layer By Accelerated Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.17500/) (2024)
- [Operator Splitting for Convex Constrained Markov Decision Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14002/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Enforcing prescribed global integral constraints in mesh-free neural PDE solvers is challenging in high-dimensional domains. Existing projection methods for spatial integrals are often tied to fixed grids or uniform quadrature, which can conflict with randomly sampled physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and scale poorly with dimension. High-order differential operators also increase reverse-mode automatic differentiation memory costs. We propose Stochastic Dimension Implicit Functional Projection (SDIFP), a quadrature-level framework for enforcing prescribed first and second spatial moments. SDIFP replaces tensor-product nodal projection by a global affine correction of the neural-network output, with two scalar coefficients determined from a weighted quadrature rule. Under positive target variance and nonzero empirical raw variance, this correction is the nearest-point projection, in the weighted quadrature norm, onto the empirical two-moment constraint set. Thus, the prescribed moments are exact for the selected quadrature rule, while continuum errors are quadrature errors of the corrected field. For decomposable high-dimensional linear operators, SDIFP combines affine moment correction with stochastic operator-subset sampling. With independent residual and derivative sampling and conditionally unbiased coefficient-gradient estimation, the resulting estimator is unbiased for the specified quadrature-based residual objective; the shared-subset fast mode is biased in general. SDIFP avoids tensor-product quadrature for moment enforcement, separates forward quadrature evaluation from the reverse-mode graph, and retains pointwise inference efficiency once the affine coefficients are fixed or precomputed.
