# Post-hoc Self-explanation of CNNs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28466 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.28466/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [Densely Connected Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.06993/) (2016)
- [EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11946/) (2019)
- [Going Deeper with Convolutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.4842/) (2014)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.04150/) (2015)
- [Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.11279/) (2017)
- [RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07421/) (2018)
- [This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10574/) (2018)
- [Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05796/) (2017)
- [Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07538/) (2018)
- [CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10154/) (2022)
- [Net2Vec: Quantifying and Explaining how Concepts are Encoded by Filters in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03454/) (2018)
- [Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.15417/) (2020)
- [A Framework to Learn with Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.09345/) (2020)
- [How to be Fair and Diverse?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.07183/) (2016)
- [Concept-Based Explanations in Computer Vision: Where Are We and Where Could We Go?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13456/) (2024)
- [Interpretable Image Classification via Non-parametric Part Prototype Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10247/) (2025)
- [Instance-wise or Class-wise? A Tale of Neighbor Shapley for Concept-based Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01369/) (2021)
- [Prototypical Self-Explainable Models Without Re-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.07822/) (2023)
- [Pantypes: Diverse Representatives for Self-Explainable Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09383/) (2024)
- [Multi-Depth Concept Extraction for Post-Hoc Vision Encoder Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.19700/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Although standard Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) can be mathematically reinterpreted as Self-Explainable Models (SEMs), their built-in prototypes do not on their own accurately represent the data. Replacing the final linear layer with a k-means-based classifier addresses this limitation without compromising performance. This work introduces a common formalization of k-means-based post-hoc explanations for the classifier, the encoder's final output (B4), and combinations of intermediate feature activations. The latter approach leverages the spatial consistency of convolutional receptive fields to generate concept-based explanation maps, which are supported by gradient-free feature attribution maps. Empirical evaluation with a ResNet34 shows that using shallower, less compressed feature activations, such as those from the last three blocks (B234), results in a trade-off between semantic fidelity and a slight reduction in predictive performance.