# Data Organization Matters in Multimodal Instruction Tuning: A Controlled Study of Capability Trade-offs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27744 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.27744/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 15 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM training and visual instruction tuning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-training-and-visual-instruction-tuning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12597/) (2023)
- [Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14198/) (2022)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12966/) (2023)
- [Towards VQA Models That Can Read](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08920/) (2019)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00398/) (2020)
- [A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.07396/) (2016)
- [mPLUG-DocOwl 1.5: Unified Structure Learning for OCR-free Document Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12895/) (2024)
- [ChartX & ChartVLM: A Versatile Benchmark and Foundation Model for Complicated Chart Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12185/) (2024)
- [SEFE: Superficial and Essential Forgetting Eliminator for Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02486/) (2025)
- [mPLUG-PaperOwl: Scientific Diagram Analysis with the Multimodal Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.18248/) (2023)
- [Dynamic Mixture of Curriculum LoRA Experts for Continual Multimodal Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11672/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) perform strongly on general visual understanding, diagram and chart reasoning, and document-centric perception. However, these abilities are learned from heterogeneous supervision sources with very different task structures and learning demands, and the effect of their temporal organization during training remains underexplored. We study whether data organization affects the trade-off among general understanding, structured reasoning, and fine-grained OCR/document understanding in multimodal instruction tuning. To isolate this factor, we use a controlled three-stage training framework in which the backbone, trainable modules, and optimization pipeline are fixed across all runs, and only the temporal arrangement of post-alignment supervision is changed. We compare four strategies: direct mixture, curriculum training, balanced sampling, and reverse curriculum. Experiments on general visual instruction following, diagram reasoning, chart reasoning, scene-text question answering, and document question answering show that data organization is a first-order design variable in multimodal adaptation. Curriculum training gives the best overall trade-off and the strongest structured reasoning performance. Balanced sampling is better for OCR-oriented capability but weakens the broader capability balance. Reverse curriculum performs worst in both final performance and optimization stability. Training-dynamics analysis further suggests that building general understanding and reasoning before introducing OCR-intensive supervision leads to smoother optimization and faster convergence. These findings highlight data scheduling as an explicit design dimension for multimodal model adaptation.