# Compliance-Aware Predictive Process Monitoring: A Neuro-Symbolic Approach

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26948 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.26948/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [A Semantic Loss Function for Deep Learning with Symbolic Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.11157/) (2017)
- [Learning Explanatory Rules from Noisy Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.04574/) (2017)
- [Logic Tensor Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13635/) (2020)
- [Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.02130/) (2016)
- [ProcessTransformer: Predictive Business Process Monitoring with Transformer Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00721/) (2021)
- [PGTNet: A Process Graph Transformer Network for Remaining Time Prediction of Business Process Instances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06267/) (2024)
- [Neuro-Symbolic Predictive Process Monitoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.00834/) (2025)
- [Achieving Group Fairness through Independence in Predictive Process Monitoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04914/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Decision-Aware Suffix Prediction and Reasoning of Business Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.06169/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Existing approaches for predictive process monitoring are sub-symbolic, meaning that they learn correlations between descriptive features and a target feature fully based on data, e.g., predicting the surgical needs of a patient based on historical events and biometrics. However, such approaches fail to incorporate domain-specific process constraints (knowledge), e.g., surgery can only be planned if the patient was released more than a week ago, limiting the adherence to compliance and providing less accurate predictions. In this paper, we present a neuro-symbolic approach for predictive process monitoring, leveraging Logic Tensor Networks (LTNs) to inject process knowledge into predictive models. The proposed approach follows a structured pipeline consisting of four key stages: 1) feature extraction; 2) rule extraction; 3) knowledge base creation; and 4) knowledge injection. Our evaluation shows that, in addition to learning the process constraints, the neuro-symbolic model also achieves better performance, demonstrating higher compliance and improved accuracy compared to baseline approaches across all compliance-aware experiments.
