# Shapley meets Rawls: an integrated framework for measuring and explaining unfairness

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26476 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.26476/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.07524/) (2016)
- [Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.05807/) (2016)
- [Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.08230/) (2017)
- [Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.05144/) (2017)
- [Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.09207/) (2017)
- [Explaining Deep Neural Networks with a Polynomial Time Algorithm for Shapley Values Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.10992/) (2019)
- [Explainability for fair machine learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.07389/) (2020)
- [Explainability is NOT a Game](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.07514/) (2023)
- [The Fairness of Credit Scoring Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10200/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Explainability and fairness have mainly been considered separately, with recent exceptions trying the explain the sources of unfairness. This paper shows that the Shapley value can be used to both define and explain unfairness, under standard group fairness criteria. This offers an integrated framework to estimate and derive inference on unfairness as-well-as the features that contribute to it. Our framework can also be extended from Shapley values to the family of Efficient-Symmetric-Linear (ESL) values, some of which offer more robust definitions of fairness, and shorter computation times. An illustration is run on the Census Income dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. Our approach shows that ``Age", ``Number of hours" and ``Marital status" generate gender unfairness, using shorter computation time than traditional Bootstrap tests.