# PEANUT: Perturbations by Eigenvector Alignment for Attacking Graph Neural Networks Under Topology-Driven Message Passing

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26136 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.26136/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02907/) (2016)
- [Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02216/) (2017)
- [How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.00826/) (2018)
- [Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.01212/) (2017)
- [Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06103/) (2017)
- [Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.07153/) (2019)
- [Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.01973/) (2018)
- [Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Traffic Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.04875/) (2017)
- [MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.00564/) (2017)
- [Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.08861/) (2016)
- [Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09405/) (2020)
- [Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02415/) (2016)
- [TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08663/) (2020)
- [Benchmarking Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00982/) (2020)
- [Adversarial Attacks on Neural Networks for Graph Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.07984/) (2018)
- [Adversarial Attack on Graph Structured Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.02371/) (2018)
- [Adversarial Attacks on Graph Neural Networks via Meta Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.08412/) (2019)
- [Graph Neural Network for Traffic Forecasting: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.11174/) (2021)
- [Adversarial Attack and Defense on Graph Data: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.10528/) (2018)
- [Robustness of Graph Neural Networks at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14038/) (2021)
- [A Restricted Black-box Adversarial Framework Towards Attacking Graph Embedding Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.01297/) (2019)
- [TDGIA:Effective Injection Attacks on Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06663/) (2021)
- [Fast Gradient Attack on Network Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02797/) (2018)
- [Understanding and Improving Graph Injection Attack by Promoting Unnoticeability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.08057/) (2022)
- [Scalable Attack on Graph Data by Injecting Vicious Nodes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.13825/) (2020)
- [Single Node Injection Attack against Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.13049/) (2021)
- [A Survey of Adversarial Learning on Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.05730/) (2020)
- [p-Laplacian Based Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.07337/) (2021)
- [Let Graph be the Go Board: Gradient-free Node Injection Attack for Graph Neural Networks via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10782/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs) have achieved strong performance on tasks involving relational data. However, small perturbations to graph structure can significantly alter their outputs, raising concerns about their robustness in real-world deployment in security critical environments. In this work, we study a core vulnerability in MPNNs that explicitly consume graph topology via the adjacency matrix or Laplacian as part of their message passing mechanism. We show that this design choice exposes an extremely vulnerable attack surface, with significant effects even under minimal perturbation. Building on this observation, we propose PEA, a simple, gradient-free, black-box injection attack that requires only a single query to the target model, capitalizing on this vulnerability by constructing a perturbation aligned with a specific significant eigenvector to induce large output deviations. Unlike graph modification attacks, PEA operates under the realistic assumption that adversaries cannot alter the original graph and are limited to injecting new nodes at inference time. PEA requires no iterative optimization, parameter learning, or surrogate models---which require additional training and remain susceptible to differences in model priors and generalization capabilities---thereby avoiding significant computational overhead and the associated transferability challenges. We evaluate PEA on popular benchmark datasets across three graph learning tasks, showing consistent performance degradation under realistic attack constraints despite its simplicity. Our results reveal a fundamental security weakness in topology-driven message passing architectures and urge an implementation shift, as the worst effects of such attacks can be substantially mitigated through appropriate input filtering.
