# Do All Vision Transformers Need Registers? A Cross-Architectural Reassessment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25803 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25803/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06377/) (2021)
- [Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14294/) (2021)
- [iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.07832/) (2021)
- [Vision Transformers Need Registers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16588/) (2023)
- [Localizing Objects with Self-Supervised Transformers and no Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.14279/) (2021)
- [Self-Supervised Transformers for Unsupervised Object Discovery using Normalized Cut](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.11539/) (2022)
- [Memory Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11527/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [LookWhen? Fast Video Recognition by Learning When, Where, and What to Compute](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.06809/) (2026)
- [Decoding Register Tokens Preserves Global Scene Details](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13299/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Training Vision Transformers (ViTs) presents significant challenges, one of which is the emergence of artifacts in attention maps, hindering their interpretability. Darcet et al. (2024) investigated this phenomenon and attributed it to the need of ViTs to store global information beyond the [CLS] token. They proposed a novel solution involving the addition of empty input tokens, named registers, which successfully eliminate artifacts and improve the clarity of attention maps. In this work, we reproduce the findings of Darcet et al. (2024) and evaluate the generalizability of their claims across multiple models, including DINO, DINOv2, OpenCLIP, and DeiT3. While we confirm the validity of several of their key claims, our results reveal that some claims do not extend universally to other models. Additionally, we explore the impact of model size, extending their findings to smaller models. Finally, we untie terminology inconsistencies found in the original paper and explain their impact when generalizing to a wider range of models.