# Can Users Specify Driving Speed? Bench2Drive-Speed: Benchmark and Baselines for Desired-Speed Conditioned Autonomous Driving

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25672 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25672/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in End-to-end system architecture, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving.
- Builds on 39 of its 56 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- End-to-end autonomous driving / [End-to-end system architecture](https://mlsanity.com/driving/end-to-end-system-architecture/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 39)

- [nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.11027/) (2019)
- [CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.03938/) (2017)
- [Planning-oriented Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10156/) (2022)
- [VAD: Vectorized Scene Representation for Efficient Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12077/) (2023)
- [DriveLM: Driving with Graph Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14150/) (2023)
- [End-to-end Driving via Conditional Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.02410/) (2017)
- [Multi-Modal Fusion Transformer for End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09224/) (2021)
- [NAVSIM: Data-Driven Non-Reactive Autonomous Vehicle Simulation and Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15349/) (2024)
- [MetaDrive: Composing Diverse Driving Scenarios for Generalizable Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.12674/) (2021)
- [Bench2Drive: Towards Multi-Ability Benchmarking of Closed-Loop End-To-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.03877/) (2024)
- [Trajectory-guided Control Prediction for End-to-end Autonomous Driving: A Simple yet Strong Baseline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08129/) (2022)
- [Parting with Misconceptions about Learning-based Vehicle Motion Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07962/) (2023)
- [Is Ego Status All You Need for Open-Loop End-to-End Autonomous Driving?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03031/) (2023)
- [Safety-Enhanced Autonomous Driving Using Interpretable Sensor Fusion Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.14024/) (2022)
- [Rethinking the Open-Loop Evaluation of End-to-End Autonomous Driving in nuScenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10430/) (2023)
- [ORION: A Holistic End-to-End Autonomous Driving Framework by Vision-Language Instructed Action Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19755/) (2025)
- [Think Twice before Driving: Towards Scalable Decoders for End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06242/) (2023)
- [SimLingo: Vision-Only Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving with Language-Action Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09594/) (2025)
- [DriveAdapter: Breaking the Coupling Barrier of Perception and Planning in End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00398/) (2023)
- [DriveTransformer: Unified Transformer for Scalable End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07656/) (2025)
- [Personalized Autonomous Driving with Large Language Models: Field Experiments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.09397/) (2023)
- [Brain4Cars: Car That Knows Before You Do via Sensory-Fusion Deep Learning Architecture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1601.00740/) (2016)
- [Hidden Biases of End-to-End Driving Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09602/) (2024)
- [MAVERIC: A Data-Driven Approach to Personalized Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08595/) (2023)
- [StyleDrive: Towards Driving-Style Aware Benchmarking of End-To-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23982/) (2025)
- [Learning Personalized Driving Styles via Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10434/) (2025)
- [Driving Style Alignment for LLM-powered Driver Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11368/) (2024)
- [On-Board Vision-Language Models for Personalized Autonomous Vehicle Motion Control: System Design and Real-World Validation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.11913/) (2024)
- [Driver Digital Twin for Online Prediction of Personalized Lane Change Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.01294/) (2022)
- [A Learning-based Discretionary Lane-Change Decision-Making Model with Driving Style Awareness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.09533/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Bench2Drive-Robust: Benchmarking Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving under Deployment Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.18059/) (2026)
- [VehDyn: A Driving World Model Benchmark for Vehicle Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33264/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

End-to-end autonomous driving (E2E-AD) has achieved remarkable progress. However, one practical and useful function has been long overlooked: users may wish to customize the desired speed of the policy or specify whether to allow the autonomous vehicle to overtake. To bridge this gap, we present Bench2Drive-Speed, a benchmark with metrics, dataset, and baselines for desired-speed conditioned autonomous driving. We introduce explicit inputs of users' desired target-speed and overtake/follow instructions to driving policy models. We design quantitative metrics, including Speed-Adherence Score and Overtake Score, to measure how faithfully policies follow user specifications, while remaining compatible with standard autonomous driving metrics. To enable training of speed-conditioned policies, one approach is to collect expert demonstrations that strictly follow speed requirements, an expensive and unscalable process in the real world. An alternative is to adapt existing regular driving data by treating the speed observed in future frames as the target speed for training. To investigate this, we construct CustomizedSpeedDataset, composed of 2,100 clips annotated with experts demonstrations, enabling systematic investigation of supervision strategies. Our experiments show that, under proper re-annotation, models trained on regular driving data perform comparably to on expert demonstrations, suggesting that speed supervision can be introduced without additional complex real-world data collection. Furthermore, we find that while target-speed following can be achieved without degrading regular driving performance, executing overtaking commands remains challenging due to the inherent difficulty of interactive behaviors. All code, datasets and baselines are available at https://github.com/Thinklab-SJTU/Bench2Drive-Speed