# PIDP-Attack: Combining Prompt Injection with Database Poisoning Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25164 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25164/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Privacy and security of RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 39 of its 54 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [Privacy and security of RAG](https://mlsanity.com/rag/privacy-and-security-of-rag/)
- LLM safety and security / [Membership inference attacks](https://mlsanity.com/safety/membership-inference-attacks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 39)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15043/) (2023)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02483/) (2023)
- [MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.09268/) (2016)
- [Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12173/) (2023)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08663/) (2021)
- [Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09118/) (2021)
- [Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09527/) (2022)
- [Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05499/) (2023)
- [A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06211/) (2024)
- [Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01833/) (2024)
- [Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12815/) (2023)
- [Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13213/) (2023)
- [Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practical](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.10149/) (2023)
- [The Power of Noise: Redefining Retrieval for RAG Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14887/) (2024)
- [Poisoning Language Models During Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00944/) (2023)
- [WebWalker: Benchmarking LLMs in Web Traversal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07572/) (2025)
- [Poisoning Retrieval Corpora by Injecting Adversarial Passages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19156/) (2023)
- [On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13661/) (2023)
- [BadEncoder: Backdoor Attacks to Pre-trained Encoders in Self-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00352/) (2021)
- [Making Them Ask and Answer: Jailbreaking Large Language Models in Few Queries via Disguise and Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18104/) (2024)
- [A Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13457/) (2024)
- [CRAG -- Comprehensive RAG Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04744/) (2024)
- [LLM Hallucinations in Practical Code Generation: Phenomena, Mechanism, and Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.20550/) (2024)
- [Revolutionizing Finance with LLMs: An Overview of Applications and Insights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11641/) (2024)
- [Instruction Backdoor Attacks Against Customized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09179/) (2024)
- [Evaluating the Instruction-Following Robustness of Large Language Models to Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10819/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Securing Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Taxonomy of Attacks, Defenses, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08304/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of applications. However, their practical deployment is often hindered by issues such as outdated knowledge and the tendency to generate hallucinations. To address these limitations, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have been introduced, enhancing LLMs with external, up-to-date knowledge sources. Despite their advantages, RAG systems remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, with data poisoning emerging as a prominent threat. Existing poisoning-based attacks typically require prior knowledge of the user's specific queries, limiting their flexibility and real-world applicability. In this work, we propose PIDP-Attack, a novel compound attack that integrates prompt injection with database poisoning in RAG. By appending malicious characters to queries at inference time and injecting a limited number of poisoned passages into the retrieval database, our method can effectively manipulate LLM response to arbitrary query without prior knowledge of the user's actual query. Experimental evaluations across three benchmark datasets (Natural Questions, HotpotQA, MS-MARCO) and eight LLMs demonstrate that PIDP-Attack consistently outperforms the original PoisonedRAG. Specifically, our method improves attack success rates by 4% to 16% on open-domain QA tasks while maintaining high retrieval precision, proving that the compound attack strategy is both necessary and highly effective.