# Enhancing Structured Meaning Representations with Aspect Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24797 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24797/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [CausalGym: Benchmarking causal interpretability methods on linguistic tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12560/) (2024)
- [Decomposing and Recomposing Event Structure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10387/) (2021)
- [A Kind Introduction to Lexical and Grammatical Aspect, with a Survey of Computational Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.09012/) (2022)
- [Aspectuality Across Genre: A Distributional Semantics Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00345/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

To fully capture the meaning of a sentence, semantic representations should encode aspect, which describes the internal temporal structure of events. In graph-based meaning representation frameworks such as Uniform Meaning Representations (UMR), aspect lets one know how events unfold over time, including distinctions such as states, activities, and completed events. Despite its importance, aspect remains sparsely annotated across semantic meaning representation frameworks. This has, in turn, hindered not only current manual annotation, but also the development of automatic systems capable of predicting aspectual information. In this paper, we introduce a new dataset of English sentences annotated with UMR aspect labels over Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) graphs that lack the feature. We describe the annotation scheme and guidelines used to label eventive predicates according to the UMR aspect lattice, as well as the annotation pipeline used to ensure consistency and quality across annotators through a multi-step adjudication process. To demonstrate the utility of our dataset for future automation, we present baseline experiments using three modeling approaches. Our results establish initial benchmarks for automatic UMR aspect prediction and provide a foundation for integrating aspect into semantic meaning representations more broadly.
