# A Framework for Generating Semantically Ambiguous Images to Probe Human and Machine Perception

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24730 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24730/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Densely Connected Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.06993/) (2016)
- [EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11946/) (2019)
- [A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.04948/) (2018)
- [Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12598/) (2022)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- [A ConvNet for the 2020s](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.03545/) (2022)
- [DreamFusion: Text-to-3D using 2D Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14988/) (2022)
- [Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.11096/) (2018)
- [ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12231/) (2018)
- [Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.1897/) (2014)
- [Human uncertainty makes classification more robust](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07086/) (2019)
- [Brain-Like Object Recognition with High-Performing Shallow Recurrent ANNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06161/) (2019)
- [Visual Anagrams: Generating Multi-View Optical Illusions with Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17919/) (2023)
- [Humans can decipher adversarial images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.04120/) (2018)
- [Diffusion Illusions: Hiding Images in Plain Sight](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03817/) (2023)
- [Emergent Properties of Foveated Perceptual Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07991/) (2020)
- [A Bayes-Optimal View on Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08859/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Now You See the Hate: Adaptive View Retrieval for Hidden Hateful Illusions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.19061/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The classic duck-rabbit illusion reveals that when visual evidence is ambiguous, the human brain must decide what it sees. But where exactly do human observers draw the line between ''duck'' and ''rabbit'', and do machine classifiers draw it in the same place? We use semantically ambiguous images as interpretability probes to expose how vision models represent the boundaries between concepts. We present a psychophysically-informed framework that interpolates between concepts in the CLIP embedding space to generate continuous spectra of ambiguous images, allowing us to precisely measure where and how humans and machine classifiers place their semantic boundaries. Using this framework, we show that machine classifiers are more biased towards seeing ''rabbit'', whereas humans are more aligned with the CLIP embedding used for synthesis, and the guidance scale seems to affect human sensitivity more strongly than machine classifiers. Our framework demonstrates how controlled ambiguity can serve as a diagnostic tool to bridge the gap between human psychophysical analysis, image classification, and generative image models, offering insight into human-model alignment, robustness, model interpretability, and image synthesis methods.