# Cost-Sensitive Neighborhood Aggregation for Heterophilous Graphs: When Does Per-Edge Routing Help?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24291 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24291/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02907/) (2016)
- [Graph Attention Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10903/) (2017)
- [Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02216/) (2017)
- [Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.01212/) (2017)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.00596/) (2019)
- [Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07606/) (2018)
- [Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05287/) (2020)
- [DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10903/) (2019)
- [On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05205/) (2020)
- [Adaptive Universal Generalized PageRank Graph Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07988/) (2020)
- [Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.14522/) (2021)
- [Beyond Low-frequency Information in Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00797/) (2021)
- [A critical look at the evaluation of GNNs under heterophily: Are we really making progress?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.11640/) (2023)
- [Revisiting Heterophily For Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07606/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work distinguishes two heterophily regimes: adversarial, where cross-class edges dilute class signal and harm classification, and informative, where the heterophilous structure itself carries useful signal. We ask: when does per-edge message routing help, and when is a uniform spectral channel sufficient? To operationalize this question we introduce Cost-Sensitive Neighborhood Aggregation (CSNA), a GNN layer that computes pairwise distance in a learned projection and uses it to soft-route each message through concordant and discordant channels with independent transformations. Under a contextual stochastic block model we show that mean aggregation can reverse the label-aligned signal direction under heterophily, and that cost-sensitive weighting with w_+/w_- > q/p preserves the correct sign. On six benchmarks with uniform tuning, CSNA is competitive with state-of-the-art methods on adversarial-heterophily datasets (Texas, Wisconsin, Cornell, Actor) but underperforms on informative-heterophily datasets (Chameleon, Squirrel) -- precisely the regime where per-edge routing has no useful decomposition to exploit. The pattern is itself the finding: the cost function's ability to separate edge types serves as a diagnostic for the heterophily regime, revealing when fine-grained routing adds value over uniform channels and when it does not. Code is available at https://github.com/eyal-weiss/CSNA-public .