# MoCHA: Denoising Caption Supervision for Motion-Text Retrieval

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23684 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.23684/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11416/) (2022)
- [Human Motion Diffusion Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14916/) (2022)
- [Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1309.5549/) (2013)
- [A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.00388/) (2020)
- [T2M-GPT: Generating Human Motion from Textual Descriptions with Discrete Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.06052/) (2023)
- [Executing your Commands via Motion Diffusion in Latent Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04048/) (2022)
- [MotionGPT: Human Motion as a Foreign Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14795/) (2023)
- [Action-Conditioned 3D Human Motion Synthesis with Transformer VAE](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05670/) (2021)
- [TEMOS: Generating diverse human motions from textual descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14109/) (2022)
- [MotionCLIP: Exposing Human Motion Generation to CLIP Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.08063/) (2022)
- [MoMask: Generative Masked Modeling of 3D Human Motions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00063/) (2023)
- [TM2T: Stochastic and Tokenized Modeling for the Reciprocal Generation of 3D Human Motions and Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.01696/) (2022)
- [The KIT Motion-Language Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.03827/) (2016)
- [BABEL: Bodies, Action and Behavior with English Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09696/) (2021)
- [TMR: Text-to-Motion Retrieval Using Contrastive 3D Human Motion Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00976/) (2023)
- [LaMP: Language-Motion Pretraining for Motion Generation, Retrieval, and Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07093/) (2024)
- [Exploring Vision Transformers for 3D Human Motion-Language Models with Motion Patches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04771/) (2024)
- [Tri-Modal Motion Retrieval by Learning a Joint Embedding Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00691/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Text-motion retrieval systems learn shared embedding spaces from motion-caption pairs via contrastive objectives. However, each caption is not a deterministic label but a sample from a distribution of valid descriptions: different annotators produce different text for the same motion, mixing motion-recoverable semantics (action type, body parts, directionality) with annotator-specific style and inferred context that cannot be determined from 3D joint coordinates alone. Standard contrastive training treats each caption as the single positive target, overlooking this distributional structure and inducing within-motion embedding variance that weakens alignment. We propose MoCHA, a text canonicalization framework that reduces this variance by projecting each caption onto its motion-recoverable content prior to encoding, producing tighter positive clusters and better-separated embeddings. Canonicalization is a general principle: even deterministic rule-based methods improve cross-dataset transfer, though learned canonicalizers provide substantially larger gains. We present two learned variants: an LLM-based approach (GPT-5.2) and a distilled FlanT5 model requiring no LLM at inference time. MoCHA operates as a preprocessing step compatible with any retrieval architecture. Applied to MoPa (MotionPatches), MoCHA sets a new state of the art on both HumanML3D (H) and KIT-ML (K): the LLM variant achieves 13.9% T2M R@1 on H (+3.1pp) and 24.3% on K (+10.3pp), while the LLM-free T5 variant achieves gains of +2.5pp and +8.1pp. Canonicalization reduces within-motion text-embedding variance by 11-19% and improves cross-dataset transfer substantially, with H to K improving by 94% and K to H by 52%, demonstrating that standardizing the language space yields more transferable motion-language representations.