# Plato's Cave: A Human-Centered Research Verification System

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23526 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.23526/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09332/) (2021)
- [FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05355/) (2018)
- [Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14974/) (2020)
- [ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00622/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The growing publication rate of research papers has created an urgent need for better ways to fact-check information, assess writing quality, and identify unverifiable claims. We present Plato's Cave as an open-source, human-centered research verification system that (i) creates a directed acyclic graph (DAG) from a document, (ii) leverages web agents to assign credibility scores to nodes and edges from the DAG, and (iii) gives a final score by interpreting and evaluating the paper's argumentative structure. We report the system implementation and results on a collected dataset of 104 research papers.