# Benchmarking Deep Learning Models for Aerial LiDAR Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation under Real Acquisition Conditions: A Case Study in Navarre

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22229 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22229/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00593/) (2016)
- [PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02413/) (2017)
- [ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.04405/) (2017)
- [Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07829/) (2018)
- [Point Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00931/) (2020)
- [4D Spatio-Temporal ConvNets: Minkowski Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08755/) (2019)
- [KPConv: Flexible and Deformable Convolution for Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08889/) (2019)
- [PointCNN: Convolution On X-Transformed Points](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07791/) (2018)
- [PCT: Point cloud transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09688/) (2020)
- [PointConv: Deep Convolutional Networks on 3D Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.07246/) (2018)
- [Point Transformer V3: Simpler, Faster, Stronger](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10035/) (2023)
- [RandLA-Net: Efficient Semantic Segmentation of Large-Scale Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11236/) (2019)
- [Point Transformer V2: Grouped Vector Attention and Partition-based Pooling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05666/) (2022)
- [Large-scale Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation with Superpoint Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.09869/) (2017)
- [Stratified Transformer for 3D Point Cloud Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14508/) (2022)
- [Semantic3D.net: A new Large-scale Point Cloud Classification Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.03847/) (2017)
- [DALES: A Large-scale Aerial LiDAR Data Set for Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.11985/) (2020)
- [Efficient 3D Semantic Segmentation with Superpoint Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08045/) (2023)
- [DublinCity: Annotated LiDAR Point Cloud and its Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03613/) (2019)
- [FRACTAL: An Ultra-Large-Scale Aerial Lidar Dataset for 3D Semantic Segmentation of Diverse Landscapes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04634/) (2024)
- [ECLAIR: A High-Fidelity Aerial LiDAR Dataset for Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.10699/) (2024)
- [OpenGF: An Ultra-Large-Scale Ground Filtering Dataset Built Upon Open ALS Point Clouds Around the World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.09641/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in deep learning have significantly improved 3D semantic segmentation, but most models focus on indoor or terrestrial datasets. Their behavior under real aerial acquisition conditions remains insufficiently explored, and although a few studies have addressed similar scenarios, they differ in dataset design, acquisition conditions, and model selection. To address this gap, we conduct an experimental benchmark evaluating several state-of-the-art architectures on a large-scale aerial LiDAR dataset acquired under operational flight conditions in Navarre, Spain, covering heterogeneous urban, rural, and industrial landscapes. This study compares four representative deep learning models, including KPConv, RandLA-Net, Superpoint Transformer, and Point Transformer V3, across five semantic classes commonly found in airborne surveys, such as ground, vegetation, buildings, and vehicles, highlighting the inherent challenges of class imbalance and geometric variability in aerial data. Results show that all tested models achieve high overall accuracy exceeding 93%, with KPConv attaining the highest mean IoU (78.51%) through consistent performance across classes, particularly on challenging and underrepresented categories. Point Transformer V3 demonstrates superior performance on the underrepresented vehicle class (75.11% IoU), while Superpoint Transformer and RandLA-Net trade off segmentation robustness for computational efficiency.