# Autoregressive vs. Masked Diffusion Language Models: A Controlled Comparison

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22075 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22075/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Discrete and text diffusion, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Discrete and text diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/discrete-and-text-diffusion/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00752/) (2023)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [Structured Denoising Diffusion Models in Discrete State-Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03006/) (2021)
- [DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04434/) (2024)
- [A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.03055/) (2015)
- [Simple and Effective Masked Diffusion Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07524/) (2024)
- [Discrete Diffusion Modeling by Estimating the Ratios of the Data Distribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16834/) (2023)
- [Gated Linear Attention Transformers with Hardware-Efficient Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06635/) (2023)
- [Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01886/) (2018)
- [MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01454/) (2021)
- [TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07759/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Masked Diffusion Language Models are Strong and Steerable Text-Based World Models for Agentic RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.16204/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present a controlled empirical comparison between autoregressive (AR) and masked diffusion (MDLM) language models. Both models are trained on identical data (50M tokens from TinyStories), identical compute budget (20,000 steps, batch size 32, sequence length 512), and identical hardware (NVIDIA H100 80GB), isolating the generation paradigm as the sole variable. We report three findings. First, both paradigms achieve comparable training throughput (~50K tokens/second), with MDLM requiring only 4.7% more wall-clock time. Second, AR converges faster and begins overfitting by step 14,000, while MDLM converges more slowly and is still improving at step 20,000, suggesting different compute-optimal training regimes. Third, quantitative diversity analysis over 1,000 generated samples reveals a structural diversity-fluency trade-off: AR produces fluent but repetitive outputs (99.8% begin with the same word), while MDLM generates more diverse narratives (93.4% unique 5-word openings, higher Distinct-n, lower Self-BLEU), at the cost of occasional grammatical inconsistencies. All code, trained checkpoints, and data pipelines are released for reproducibility.