# A Generalised Exponentiated Gradient Approach to Enhance Fairness in Binary and Multi-class Classification Tasks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21393 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.21393/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 72 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09635/) (2019)
- [Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.07524/) (2016)
- [A Reductions Approach to Fair Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02453/) (2018)
- [Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.05807/) (2016)
- [Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.08230/) (2017)
- [Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.04053/) (2020)
- [A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04422/) (2018)
- [Large Language Models(LLMs) on Tabular Data: Prediction, Generation, and Understanding -- A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17944/) (2024)
- [Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.07068/) (2022)
- [A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.00787/) (2018)
- [Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and Improvements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.04562/) (2019)
- [Fairness in Credit Scoring: Assessment, Implementation and Profit Implications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01907/) (2021)
- [Fairness Testing: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis of Trends](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.10223/) (2022)
- [Algorithmic Fairness Datasets: the Story so Far](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01711/) (2022)
- [Fairness-aware Configuration of Machine Learning Libraries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06196/) (2022)
- [Blackbox Post-Processing for Multiclass Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.04461/) (2022)
- [How fair are we? From conceptualization to automated assessment of fairness definitions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09919/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread use of AI and ML models in sensitive areas raises significant concerns about fairness. While the research community has introduced various methods for bias mitigation in binary classification tasks, the issue remains under-explored in multi-class classification settings. To address this limitation, in this paper, we first formulate the problem of fair learning in multi-class classification as a multi-objective problem between effectiveness (i.e., prediction correctness) and multiple linear fairness constraints. Next, we propose a Generalised Exponentiated Gradient (GEG) algorithm to solve this task. GEG is an in-processing algorithm that enhances fairness in binary and multi-class classification settings under multiple fairness definitions. We conduct an extensive empirical evaluation of GEG against six baselines across seven multi-class and three binary datasets, using four widely adopted effectiveness metrics and three fairness definitions.
