# Personality-Driven Student Agent-Based Modeling in Mathematics Education: How Well Do Student Agents Align with Human Learners?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21358 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.21358/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Educational agents and math problem solving, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 2 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Educational agents and math problem solving](https://mlsanity.com/agents/educational-agents-and-math-problem-solving/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

It is crucial to explore the impact of different teaching methods on student learning in educational research. However, real-person experiments face significant ethical constraints, and we cannot conduct repeated teaching experiments on the same student. LLM-based generative agents offer a promising avenue for simulating student behavior. Before large-scale experiments, a fundamental question must be addressed: are student agents truly credible, and can they faithfully simulate human learning? In this study, we built a Big Five Personality-based student agent model with a full pipeline of student-teacher interaction, self-study, and examination. To evaluate behavioral fidelity, we collected 13 empirical studies on Big Five traits and learning, and distilled them into 14 criteria. We found that the 71.4% of the student agents' behavior was aligned with human learners.