# Rethinking Plasticity in Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21173 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.21173/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 23 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [Deep RL algorithms and representations](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/deep-rl-algorithms-and-representations/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07802/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06767/) (2023)
- [The Dormant Neuron Phenomenon in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12902/) (2023)
- [Understanding plasticity in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01486/) (2023)
- [Implicit Under-Parameterization Inhibits Data-Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.14498/) (2020)
- [Understanding and Preventing Capacity Loss in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.09560/) (2022)
- [Loss of Plasticity in Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07507/) (2023)
- [Disentangling the Causes of Plasticity Loss in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18762/) (2024)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning with Plasticity Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15555/) (2023)
- [Maintaining Plasticity in Continual Learning via Regenerative Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11958/) (2023)
- [Normalization and effective learning rates in reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01800/) (2024)
- [Addressing Loss of Plasticity and Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00781/) (2024)
- [DrM: Mastering Visual Reinforcement Learning through Dormant Ratio Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19668/) (2023)
- [Slow and Steady Wins the Race: Maintaining Plasticity with Hare and Tortoise Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02596/) (2024)
- [Small batch deep reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03882/) (2023)
- [Learning Continually by Spectral Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06811/) (2024)
- [Weight Clipping for Deep Continual and Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01704/) (2024)
- [Resetting the Optimizer in Deep RL: An Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17833/) (2023)
- [Directions of Curvature as an Explanation for Loss of Plasticity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00246/) (2023)
- [A Study of Plasticity Loss in On-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19153/) (2024)
- [An Empirical Study of Implicit Regularization in Deep Offline RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.02099/) (2022)
- [Neuroplastic Expansion in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07994/) (2024)
- [Non-Stationary Learning of Neural Networks with Automatic Soft Parameter Reset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04034/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper investigates the fundamental mechanisms driving plasticity loss in deep reinforcement learning (RL), a critical challenge where neural networks lose their ability to adapt to non-stationary environments. While existing research often relies on descriptive metrics like dormant neurons or effective rank, these summaries fail to explain the underlying optimization dynamics. We propose the Optimization-Centric Plasticity (OCP) hypothesis, which posits that plasticity loss arises because optimal points from previous tasks become poor local optima for new tasks, trapping parameters during task transitions and hindering subsequent learning. We theoretically establish the equivalence between neuron dormancy and zero-gradient states, demonstrating that the absence of gradient signals is the primary driver of dormancy. Our experiments reveal that plasticity loss is highly task-specific; notably, networks with high dormancy rates in one task can achieve performance parity with randomly initialized networks when switched to a significantly different task, suggesting that the network's capacity remains intact but is inhibited by the specific optimization landscape. Furthermore, our hypothesis elucidates why parameter constraints mitigate plasticity loss by preventing deep entrenchment in local optima. Validated across diverse non-stationary scenarios, our findings provide a rigorous optimization-based framework for understanding and restoring network plasticity in complex RL domains.