# Understanding Pruning Regimes in Vision-Language Models Through Domain-Aware Layer Selection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20275 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.20275/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 21 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Visual token pruning and efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/visual-token-pruning-and-efficiency/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12597/) (2023)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00414/) (2019)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.02054/) (2019)
- [SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00774/) (2023)
- [Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Pruned](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.09418/) (2019)
- [Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10650/) (2019)
- [A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11695/) (2023)
- [LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11627/) (2023)
- [V*: Guided Visual Search as a Core Mechanism in Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14135/) (2023)
- [Reducing Transformer Depth on Demand with Structured Dropout](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11556/) (2019)
- [LMMs-Eval: Reality Check on the Evaluation of Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12772/) (2024)
- [LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23661/) (2025)
- [Compressing BERT: Studying the Effects of Weight Pruning on Transfer Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08307/) (2020)
- [Region-based Cluster Discrimination for Visual Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.20025/) (2025)
- [Greedy-layer Pruning: Speeding up Transformer Models for Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14839/) (2021)
- [VisTIRA: Closing the Image-Text Modality Gap in Visual Math Reasoning via Structured Tool Integration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14440/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Searching for Task-Specific Vision Paths: Evolutionary Block Pruning Across Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.17052/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Transformer-based vision-language models (VLMs) contain substantial depth redundancy, yet the effect of removing specific decoder layers remains poorly understood, especially for domains that require tight coupling between perception and multi-step reasoning. We study structured decoder layer pruning through the lens of domain-aware activation similarity, measuring how strongly each layer transforms representations for math versus non-math inputs. This yields simple math-aware, non-math-aware, and mixed ranking criteria that identify layers whose input-output activations change least within a target domain. Across two state-of-the-art VLMs and a broad suite of math and general multimodal benchmarks, we uncover a consistent three-regime structure: at low pruning budgets, performance is highly sensitive to which layers are removed; at moderate budgets, methods converge as structural damage accumulates; and at high budgets, structural continuity dominates, favoring spacing-aware strategies. Our domain-aware rankings achieve the strongest stability in the ranking-sensitive regime, while matching or exceeding structure-aware baselines at larger budgets. These results provide a clearer picture of how depth contributes to domain-specific behavior in VLMs and offer a practical, interpretable approach to reducing model depth without sacrificing essential mathematical or general vision-language capabilities.
