# AIMER: Calibration-Free Task-Agnostic MoE Expert Pruning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18492 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.18492/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MoE large language models, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts.
- Builds on 40 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- Mixture-of-experts / [MoE large language models](https://mlsanity.com/moe/moe-large-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 40)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.06538/) (2017)
- [Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.03961/) (2021)
- [BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10044/) (2019)
- [Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02789/) (2018)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00414/) (2019)
- [Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01210/) (2023)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04434/) (2024)
- [SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00774/) (2023)
- [WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instruct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08568/) (2023)
- [GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15763/) (2026)
- [Sheared LLaMA: Accelerating Language Model Pre-training via Structured Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06694/) (2023)
- [WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04770/) (2024)
- [Data-free parameter pruning for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1507.06149/) (2015)
- [Merge, Then Compress: Demystify Efficient SMoE with Hints from Its Routing Policy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01334/) (2023)
- [Task-Specific Expert Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00277/) (2022)
- [DeepHoyer: Learning Sparser Neural Network with Differentiable Scale-Invariant Sparsity Measures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09979/) (2019)
- [Efficient Expert Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Language Models: Enhancing Performance and Reducing Inference Costs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00945/) (2024)
- [REAP the Experts: Why Pruning Prevails for One-Shot MoE compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13999/) (2025)
- [SEER-MoE: Sparse Expert Efficiency through Regularization for Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05089/) (2024)
- [Merging Experts into One: Improving Computational Efficiency of Mixture of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09832/) (2023)
- [Diversifying the Expert Knowledge for Task-Agnostic Pruning in Sparse Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09590/) (2024)
- [Memory-efficient NLLB-200: Language-specific Expert Pruning of a Massively Multilingual Machine Translation Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09811/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [How to Score Experts for One-Shot MoE Expert Pruning: A Unified Formulation and Selection Principle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.15716/) (2026)
- [HodgeCover: Higher-Order Topological Coverage Drives Compression of Sparse Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.13997/) (2026)
- [Router Sensitivity Under Lightweight Fine-Tuning Identifies Prunable Experts in Mixture-of-Experts Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.07890/) (2026)
- [ACE: Adaptive Calibration-Free Expert Skipping for MoE-based LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.05228/) (2026)
- [RAZOR: Pruning Replaceable Experts in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.30465/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models increase parameter capacity without proportional per-token computation, yet deployment still requires storing the full expert pool, making expert pruning important for reducing memory and serving overhead. Existing task-agnostic expert-pruning methods are typically calibration-dependent: they estimate expert importance from routing or activation statistics on a calibration set, making pruning decisions sensitive to calibration-data variation while introducing substantial preprocessing cost. We propose AIMER (Absolute mean over root mean square IMportance for Expert Ranking), a simple calibration-free criterion that identifies more distinct experts by capturing the concentration pattern of expert weights, making it well suited for task-agnostic expert pruning. Across 7B to 47B MoE language models with distinct architectures and 16 diverse benchmarks, AIMER consistently delivers stronger capability balance across diverse tasks than existing calibration-free methods. Surprisingly, AIMER also achieves better balance than strong calibration-based expert-pruning baselines calibrated on the widely used task-agnostic C4 corpus, while requiring only 0.22--2.06 seconds to score all experts.