# Interpretable Prostate Cancer Detection using a Small Cohort of MRI Images

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18460 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.18460/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 8 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.05747/) (2017)
- [Advances in Medical Image Analysis with Vision Transformers: A Comprehensive Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.03505/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Prostate cancer is a leading cause of mortality in men, yet interpretation of T2-weighted prostate MRI remains challenging due to subtle and heterogeneous lesions. We developed an interpretable framework for automatic cancer detection using a small dataset of 162 T2-weighted images (102 cancer, 60 normal), addressing data scarcity through transfer learning and augmentation. We performed a comprehensive comparison of Vision Transformers (ViT, Swin), CNNs (ResNet18), and classical methods (Logistic Regression, SVM, HOG+SVM). Transfer-learned ResNet18 achieved the best performance (90.9% accuracy, 95.2% sensitivity, AUC 0.905) with only 11M parameters, while Vision Transformers showed lower performance despite substantially higher complexity. Notably, HOG+SVM achieved comparable accuracy (AUC 0.917), highlighting the effectiveness of handcrafted features in small datasets. Unlike state-of-the-art approaches relying on biparametric MRI (T2+DWI) and large cohorts, our method achieves competitive performance using only T2-weighted images, reducing acquisition complexity and computational cost. In a reader study of 22 cases, five radiologists achieved a mean sensitivity of 67.5% (Fleiss Kappa = 0.524), compared to 95.2% for the AI model, suggesting potential for AI-assisted screening to reduce missed cancers and improve consistency. Code and data are publicly available.