# Exploring parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) of billion-parameter vision models with QLoRA and DoRA: insights into generalization for limited-data image classification under a 98:1 test-to-train regime

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17782 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.17782/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14294/) (2021)
- [Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.00751/) (2019)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01903/) (2021)
- [Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.10054/) (2022)
- [Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.06839/) (2018)
- [Application of deep learning for livestock behaviour recognition: A systematic literature review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13483/) (2023)
- [A Computer Vision Pipeline for Individual-Level Behavior Analysis: Benchmarking on the Edinburgh Pig Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.12047/) (2025)
- [From Manual Observation to Automated Monitoring: Space Allowance Effects on Play Behaviour in Group-Housed Dairy Calves](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00111/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Automated behavior classification is essential for precision livestock farming but faces challenges of high computational costs and limited labeled data. This study systematically compared three approaches: training from scratch (ResNet-18, ViT-Small), frozen feature extraction, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) of the DINOv3 foundation model (6.7 billion parameters). We evaluated QLoRA and DoRA across multiple configurations varying rank (8, 16, 64) and target modules (q_proj versus all-linear layers). With 2,160 verified training images, we assessed generalization of our model on 211,800 test samples, which is essentially a 98:1 test-to-train ratio. Results demonstrated that PEFT substantially outperformed alternatives, where the best QLoRA configuration (all-linear layers and rank=64) achieved 83.16% test accuracy with only 2.72% parameters (183.0M) in 5.8 hours, compared to 72.87% for ResNet-18 (16.8 hours), 61.91% for ViT-Small (18.7 hours), and 76.56% for frozen DINOv3 (17.5 hours). DoRA achieved comparable accuracy (83.14%) but with longer training time (11.0 hours). Notably, increasing adapter capacity consistently improved generalization while simultaneously not causing overfitting: reducing rank from 16 to 8 decreased test accuracy from 78.38% to 77.17%, while expanding from q_proj-only to all-linear layers with rank=64 improved accuracy from 78.38% to 83.16%. This suggests underfitting, instead of overfitting, is the primary challenge when adapting foundation models to agricultural imagery. Our findings provide guidelines for deploying billion-parameter vision models with PEFT in agricultural livestock applications.