# Proactive Knowledge Inquiry in Doctor-Patient Dialogue: Stateful Extraction, Belief Updating, and Path-Aware Action Planning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17425 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.17425/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [LayoutLMv3: Pre-training for Document AI with Unified Text and Image Masking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.08387/) (2022)
- [OCR-free Document Understanding Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.15664/) (2021)
- [PubTables-1M: Towards comprehensive table extraction from unstructured documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.00061/) (2021)
- [Structured prediction models for RNN based sequence labeling in clinical text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.00612/) (2016)
- [A Review on Knowledge Graphs for Healthcare: Resources, Applications, and Promises](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04802/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Most automated electronic medical record (EMR) pipelines remain output-oriented: they transcribe, extract, and summarize after the consultation, but they do not explicitly model what is already known, what is still missing, which uncertainty matters most, or what question or recommendation should come next. We formulate doctor-patient dialogue as a proactive knowledge-inquiry problem under partial observability. The proposed framework combines stateful extraction, sequential belief updating, gap-aware state modeling, hybrid retrieval over objectified medical knowledge, and a POMDP-lite action planner. Instead of treating the EMR as the only target artifact, the framework treats documentation as the structured projection of an ongoing inquiry loop. To make the formulation concrete, we report a controlled pilot evaluation on ten standardized multi-turn dialogues together with a 300-query retrieval benchmark aggregated across dialogues. On this pilot protocol, the full framework reaches 83.3% coverage, 80.0% risk recall, 81.4% structural completeness, and lower redundancy than the chunk-only and template-heavy interactive baselines. These pilot results do not establish clinical generalization; rather, they suggest that proactive inquiry may be methodologically interesting under tightly controlled conditions and can be viewed as a conceptually appealing formulation worth further investigation for dialogue-based EMR generation. This work should be read as a pilot concept demonstration under a controlled simulated setting rather than as evidence of clinical deployment readiness. No implication of clinical deployment readiness, clinical safety, or real-world clinical utility should be inferred from this pilot protocol.