# Large Reasoning Models Struggle to Transfer Parametric Knowledge Across Scripts

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17070 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.17070/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 11 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13372/) (2024)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06471/) (2025)
- [Olmo 3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.13961/) (2025)
- [ECLeKTic: a Novel Challenge Set for Evaluation of Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.21228/) (2025)
- [MultiLoKo: a multilingual local knowledge benchmark for LLMs spanning 31 languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10356/) (2025)
- [Language-Specific Latent Process Hinders Cross-Lingual Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13141/) (2025)
- [Translation as a Scalable Proxy for Multilingual Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11778/) (2026)
- [Rethinking Cross-lingual Gaps from a Statistical Viewpoint](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.15551/) (2025)
- [LiveCLKTBench: Towards Reliable Evaluation of Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfer in Multilingual LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.14774/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [OmnilingualGAIA2: Evaluating the Multilingual Gap in Frontier AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.08775/) (2026)
- [PolyFact: Comparing Consistency-Driven Post-training Methods for Cross-Lingual Factual Recall](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.06586/) (2026)
- [Why Pretraining Fails to Share Cross-Lingual Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.19291/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we analyze shortcomings in cross-lingual knowledge transfer in large, modern reasoning LLMs. We demonstrate that the perceived gap in knowledge transfer is primarily a script barrier. First, we conduct an observational data analysis on the performance of thinking models on two datasets with local knowledge from around the world, ECLeKTic and MultiLoKo. Our regression analysis shows that script match - not language or family - is the primary predictor of knowledge transfer failure once model capability and question difficulty are accounted for. We further this finding by providing the LLMs with the key entities of the questions in their source language and find that this disproportionately improves cross-script questions. We then posit that these LLMs could be reasoning better at test-time. To evaluate this, we develop a synthetic generation pipeline to design SFT samples to encourage the model to better reason about transliteration ambiguities when trying to fetch parametric knowledge at inference-time. We show that teaching two models to reason better reduces the cross-script transfer gap. As a result, we conclude that there is potential to improve cross-lingual parametric knowledge transfer during post-training.