# V-DyKnow: A Dynamic Benchmark for Time-Sensitive Knowledge in Vision Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16581 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16581/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14767/) (2023)
- [The Platonic Representation Hypothesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07987/) (2024)
- [Can We Edit Factual Knowledge by In-Context Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12740/) (2023)
- [Aging with GRACE: Lifelong Model Editing with Discrete Key-Value Adaptors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11031/) (2022)
- [Can Pre-trained Vision and Language Models Answer Visual Information-Seeking Questions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.11713/) (2023)
- [ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.10198/) (2024)
- [DyKnow: Dynamically Verifying Time-Sensitive Factual Knowledge in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08700/) (2024)
- [How Do LLMs Acquire New Knowledge? A Knowledge Circuits Perspective on Continual Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11196/) (2025)
- [Lifelong Knowledge Editing for Vision Language Models with Low-Rank Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15432/) (2024)
- [MCIF: Multimodal Crosslingual Instruction-Following Benchmark from Scientific Talks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19634/) (2025)
- [LLMs as Repositories of Factual Knowledge: Limitations and Solutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12774/) (2025)
- [Training-Free Personalization via Retrieval and Reasoning on Fingerprints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18623/) (2025)
- [Formality is Favored: Unraveling the Learning Preferences of Large Language Models on Data with Conflicting Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04784/) (2024)
- [CIVET: Systematic Evaluation of Understanding in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05146/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are trained on data snapshots of documents, including images and texts. Their training data and evaluation benchmarks are typically static, implicitly treating factual knowledge as time-invariant. However, real-world facts are intrinsically time-sensitive and subject to erratic and periodic changes, causing model predictions to become outdated. We present V-DyKnow, a Visual Dynamic Knowledge benchmark for evaluating time-sensitive factual knowledge in VLMs. Using V-DyKnow, we benchmark closed- and open-source VLMs and analyze a) the reliability (correctness and consistency) of model responses across modalities and input perturbations; b) the efficacy of knowledge editing and multi-modal RAG methods for knowledge updates across modalities; and c) the sources of outdated predictions, through data and mechanistic analysis. Our results show that VLMs frequently output outdated facts, reflecting outdated snapshots used in the (pre-)training phase. Factual reliability degrades from textual to visual stimuli, even when entities are correctly recognized. Besides, existing alignment approaches fail to consistently update the models' knowledge across modalities. Together, these findings highlight fundamental limitations in how current VLMs acquire and update time-sensitive knowledge across modalities. We release the benchmark, code, and evaluation data.