# Exploring different approaches to customize language models for domain-specific text-to-code generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16526 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16526/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10997/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14196/) (2024)
- [StarCoder: may the source be with you!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06161/) (2023)
- [Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14608/) (2024)
- [Textbooks Are All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11644/) (2023)
- [BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15877/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06196/) (2024)
- [CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.10297/) (2020)
- [TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07759/) (2023)
- [The Stack: 3 TB of permissively licensed source code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15533/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in generating executable code from natural language descriptions. However, general-purpose models often struggle in specialized programming contexts where domain-specific libraries, APIs, or conventions must be used. Customizing smaller open-source models offers a cost-effective alternative to relying on large proprietary systems. In this work, we investigate how smaller language models can be adapted for domain-specific code generation using synthetic datasets. We construct datasets of programming exercises across three domains within the Python ecosystem: general Python programming, Scikit-learn machine learning workflows, and OpenCV-based computer vision tasks. Using these datasets, we evaluate three customization strategies: few-shot prompting, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and parameter-efficient fine-tuning using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA). Performance is evaluated using both benchmark-based metrics and similarity-based metrics that measure alignment with domain-specific code. Our results show that prompting-based approaches such as few-shot learning and RAG can improve domain relevance in a cost-effective manner, although their impact on benchmark accuracy is limited. In contrast, LoRA-based fine-tuning consistently achieves higher accuracy and stronger domain alignment across most tasks. These findings highlight practical trade-offs between flexibility, computational cost, and performance when adapting smaller language models for specialized programming tasks.