# VIEW2SPACE: Studying Multi-View Visual Reasoning from Sparse Observations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16506 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16506/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 42 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 42)

- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14238/) (2023)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05271/) (2024)
- [OpenAI GPT-5 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03267/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05525/) (2024)
- [SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12168/) (2024)
- [Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14171/) (2024)
- [BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12390/) (2024)
- [An Embodied Generalist Agent in 3D World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12871/) (2023)
- [Molmo and PixMo: Open Weights and Open Data for State-of-the-Art Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.17146/) (2024)
- [What matters when building vision-language models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02246/) (2024)
- [SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01584/) (2024)
- [Visual Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00363/) (2022)
- [Spatial-MLLM: Boosting MLLM Capabilities in Visual-based Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23747/) (2025)
- [MANTIS: Interleaved Multi-Image Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01483/) (2024)
- [LL3DA: Visual Interactive Instruction Tuning for Omni-3D Understanding, Reasoning, and Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.18651/) (2023)
- [LLaVA-3D: A Simple yet Effective Pathway to Empowering LMMs with 3D-awareness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18125/) (2024)
- [3DSRBench: A Comprehensive 3D Spatial Reasoning Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07825/) (2024)
- [Molmo2: Open Weights and Data for Vision-Language Models with Video Understanding and Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.10611/) (2026)
- [RoboBrain: A Unified Brain Model for Robotic Manipulation from Abstract to Concrete](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.21257/) (2025)
- [OmniSpatial: Towards Comprehensive Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03135/) (2025)
- [Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01773/) (2025)
- [MindCube: Spatial Mental Modeling from Limited Views](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21458/) (2025)
- [RoboBrain 2.0 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02029/) (2025)
- [Does Spatial Cognition Emerge in Frontier Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06468/) (2024)
- [Spatial Reasoning with Vision-Language Models in Ego-Centric Multi-View Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06266/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [GlowGS: Generative Semantic Feature Learning for 3D Gaussian Splatting in Nighttime Glow Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23602/) (2026)
- [JRDB-AVR: An Active Visual Reasoning Benchmark for Embodied Agents in Real-World Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35032/) (2026)
- [SenseWeather: Multimodal Sensing for Robust Robotic Perception under Extreme Conditions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14082/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-view visual reasoning is essential for intelligent systems that must understand complex environments from sparse and discrete viewpoints, yet existing research has largely focused on single-image or temporally dense video settings. In real-world scenarios, reasoning across views requires integrating partial observations without explicit guidance, while collecting large-scale multi-view data with accurate geometric and semantic annotations remains challenging. To address this gap, we leverage physically grounded simulation to construct diverse, high-fidelity 3D scenes with precise per-view metadata, enabling scalable data generation that remains transferable to real-world settings. Based on this engine, we introduce VIEW2SPACE, a multi-dimensional benchmark for sparse multi-view reasoning, together with a scalable, disjoint training split supporting millions of grounded question-answer pairs. Using this benchmark, a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art vision-language and spatial models reveals that multi-view reasoning remains largely unsolved, with most models performing only marginally above random guessing. We further investigate whether training can bridge this gap. Our proposed Grounded Chain-of-Thought with Visual Evidence substantially improves performance under moderate difficulty, and generalizes to real-world data, outperforming existing approaches in cross-dataset evaluation. We further conduct difficulty-aware scaling analyses across model size, data scale, reasoning depth, and visibility constraints, indicating that while geometric perception can benefit from scaling under sufficient visibility, deep compositional reasoning across sparse views remains a fundamental challenge.