# IRAM-Omega-Q: A Computational Framework for Uncertainty Regulation in Adaptive Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16020 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16020/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 0 of its 7 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2026.

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Intermittent Control Is Not Diluted Control: A Switching Effect in Artificial Agency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.17432/) (2026)
- [The Source of Disturbance Matters: External, Internal, and Control-Generated Noise in Adaptive Regulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.26428/) (2026)
- [When the Governor Becomes the Disturbance: Control-Generated Disturbance and Cost-Aware Backoff in Governed Tool-Using Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.09037/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Adaptive agents operating under uncertainty must do more than optimize task outputs: they must maintain a workable internal state under noise, perturbation, and changing conditions. This paper introduces IRAM-Omega-Q, a computational framework for modeling uncertainty regulation in adaptive agents under stochastic disturbance. The framework combines a quantum-like state representation with closed-loop adaptive control over an internal entropy signal. The quantum-like formalism is used instrumentally: the evolving state is a normalized complex amplitude vector, coherent evolution is propagated exactly as psi(t + Delta t) = exp(-i H Delta t) psi(t), and a derived density matrix supports entropy and coherence-gap analysis. Two causal control orderings are compared. In regulation-first (RF) ordering, adaptive regulation is available before current-cycle disturbance and attenuates incoming exposure; in disturbance-first (DF) ordering, current-cycle disturbance is received before a new regulatory response can be computed, and stabilization acts reactively. Publication-mode, matched-seed simulations show broadly comparable coherence-gap trajectories but lower sustained adaptive gain under RF. Susceptibility maps based on post-burn-in temporal fluctuations further show that DF shifts the critical initial-gain ridge toward larger values across multiple disturbance intervals. These results identify ordering as an architectural determinant of regulatory demand and threshold location within an otherwise shared regime structure.