# Prompt Engineering for Scale Development in Generative Psychometrics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15909 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.15909/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 30 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13586/) (2021)
- [Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07805/) (2020)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07677/) (2022)
- [A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.11382/) (2023)
- [Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.07350/) (2021)
- [Jailbreaking ChatGPT via Prompt Engineering: An Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13860/) (2023)
- [PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02547/) (2023)
- [Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Role-Play Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07702/) (2023)
- [The Prompt Report: A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering Techniques](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06608/) (2024)
- [A Good Prompt Is Worth Millions of Parameters: Low-resource Prompt-based Learning for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08484/) (2021)
- [Is Temperature the Creativity Parameter of Large Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00492/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Large Language Model Biases in Persona-Steered Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20253/) (2024)
- [Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering for large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14735/) (2023)
- [When "A Helpful Assistant" Is Not Really Helpful: Personas in System Prompts Do Not Improve Performances of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10054/) (2023)
- [Prompting Frameworks for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12785/) (2023)
- [Network Filtering for Big Data: Triangulated Maximally Filtered Graph](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.02445/) (2015)
- [Enhancing Chain-of-Thoughts Prompting with Iterative Bootstrapping in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11657/) (2023)
- [Understanding the Effects of Iterative Prompting on Truthfulness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06625/) (2024)
- [Improved prompting and process for writing user personas with LLMs, using qualitative interviews: Capturing behaviour and personality traits of users](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06391/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Prompting Strategies and Large Language Models in Systematic Literature Review Screening: Relevance and Task-Stage Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.16091/) (2025)
- [Adaptive Prompting: Ad-hoc Prompt Composition for Social Bias Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06487/) (2025)
- [Scaling Laws and In-Context Learning: A Unified Theoretical Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.06232/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [The Ultimate Tutorial for AI-driven Scale Development in Generative Psychometrics: Releasing AIGENIE from its Bottle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.28643/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This Monte Carlo simulation examines how prompt engineering strategies shape the quality of large language model (LLM)--generated personality assessment items within the AI-GENIE framework for generative psychometrics. Item pools targeting the Big Five traits were generated using multiple prompting designs (zero-shot, few-shot, persona-based, and adaptive), model temperatures, and LLMs, then evaluated and reduced using network psychometric methods. Across all conditions, AI-GENIE reliably improved structural validity following reduction, with the magnitude of its incremental contribution inversely related to the quality of the incoming item pool. Prompt design exerted a substantial influence on both pre- and post-reduction item quality. Adaptive prompting consistently outperformed non-adaptive strategies by sharply reducing semantic redundancy, elevating pre-reduction structural validity, and preserving substantially larger item pool, particularly when paired with newer, higher-capacity models. These gains were robust across temperature settings for most models, indicating that adaptive prompting mitigates common trade-offs between creativity and psychometric coherence. An exception was observed for the GPT-4o model at high temperatures, suggesting model-specific sensitivity to adaptive constraints at elevated stochasticity. Overall, the findings demonstrate that adaptive prompting is the strongest approach in this context, and that its benefits scale with model capability, motivating continued investigation of model--prompt interactions in generative psychometric pipelines.