# Context-Length Robustness in Question Answering Models: A Comparative Empirical Study

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15723 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.15723/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awareness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14135/) (2022)
- [Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05150/) (2020)
- [Extending Context Window of Large Language Models via Positional Interpolation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15595/) (2023)
- [LongLLMLingua: Accelerating and Enhancing LLMs in Long Context Scenarios via Prompt Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06839/) (2023)
- [Context Length Alone Hurts LLM Performance Despite Perfect Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.05381/) (2025)
- [Retrieval meets Long Context Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03025/) (2023)
- [The What, Why, and How of Context Length Extension Techniques in Large Language Models -- A Detailed Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07872/) (2024)
- [XL2Bench: A Benchmark for Extremely Long Context Understanding with Long-range Dependencies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05446/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models are increasingly deployed in settings where relevant information is embedded within long and noisy contexts. Despite this, robustness to growing context length remains poorly understood across different question answering tasks. In this work, we present a controlled empirical study of context-length robustness in large language models using two widely used benchmarks: SQuAD and HotpotQA. We evaluate model accuracy as a function of total context length by systematically increasing the amount of irrelevant context while preserving the answer-bearing signal. This allows us to isolate the effect of context length from changes in task difficulty. Our results show a consistent degradation in performance as context length increases, with substantially larger drops observed on multi-hop reasoning tasks compared to single-span extraction tasks. In particular, HotpotQA exhibits nearly twice the accuracy degradation of SQuAD under equivalent context expansions. These findings highlight task-dependent differences in robustness and suggest that multi-hop reasoning is especially vulnerable to context dilution. We argue that context-length robustness should be evaluated explicitly when assessing model reliability, especially for applications involving long documents or retrieval-augmented generation.