# Are Dilemmas and Conflicts in LLM Alignment Solvable? A View from Priority Graph

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15527 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.15527/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 38 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Human values and AI feedback alignment](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/human-values-and-ai-feedback-alignment/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02483/) (2023)
- [Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09527/) (2022)
- [Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17548/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01680/) (2024)
- [The Instruction Hierarchy: Training LLMs to Prioritize Privileged Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13208/) (2024)
- ["Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03825/) (2023)
- [A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06211/) (2024)
- [Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge Conflicts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13300/) (2023)
- [Knowledge Conflicts for LLMs: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08319/) (2024)
- [Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09932/) (2024)
- [Do the Rewards Justify the Means? Measuring Trade-Offs Between Rewards and Ethical Behavior in the MACHIAVELLI Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03279/) (2023)
- [Investigating the Factual Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.11019/) (2023)
- [Tensor Trust: Interpretable Prompt Injection Attacks from an Online Game](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01011/) (2023)
- [The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16019/) (2024)
- [Evaluating and Inducing Personality in Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07550/) (2022)
- [Modular Pluralism: Pluralistic Alignment via Multi-LLM Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15951/) (2024)
- [Value Kaleidoscope: Engaging AI with Pluralistic Human Values, Rights, and Duties](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00779/) (2023)
- [Instructional Segment Embedding: Improving LLM Safety with Instruction Hierarchy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09102/) (2024)
- [Unintended Impacts of LLM Alignment on Global Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15018/) (2024)
- [Aligning LLMs with Individual Preferences via Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03642/) (2024)
- [Do LLMs write like humans? Variation in grammatical and rhetorical styles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16107/) (2024)
- [DailyDilemmas: Revealing Value Preferences of LLMs with Quandaries of Daily Life](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02683/) (2024)
- [IHEval: Evaluating Language Models on Following the Instruction Hierarchy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.08745/) (2025)
- [Values in the Wild: Discovering and Analyzing Values in Real-World Language Model Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15236/) (2025)
- [MegaAgent: A Large-Scale Autonomous LLM-based Multi-Agent System Without Predefined SOPs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.09955/) (2024)
- [Language Model Alignment in Multilingual Trolley Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02273/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Constitutional Value Potentials: reading and steering internal priority margins in language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.15420/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As Large Language Models (LLMs) become more powerful and autonomous, they increasingly face conflicts and dilemmas in many scenarios. We first summarize and taxonomize these diverse conflicts. Then, we model the LLM's preferences to make different choices as a priority graph, where instructions and values are nodes, and the edges represent context-specific priorities determined by the model's output distribution. This graph reveals that a unified stable LLM alignment is very challenging, because the graph is neither static nor necessarily consistent in different contexts. Besides, it also reveals a potential vulnerability: priority hacking, where adversaries can craft deceptive contexts to manipulate the graph and bypass safety alignments. To counter this, we propose a runtime verification mechanism, enabling LLMs to query external sources to ground their context and resist manipulation. While this approach enhances robustness, we also acknowledge that many ethical and value dilemmas are philosophically irreducible, posing a long-term, open challenge for the future of AI alignment.