# Visualizing Critic Match Loss Landscapes for Interpretation of Online Reinforcement Learning Control Algorithms

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14535 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.14535/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 9 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL theory and sample complexity](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-theory-and-sample-complexity/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.09913/) (2017)
- [Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.06537/) (2017)
- [Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.06778/) (2016)
- [How to Train Your Robot with Deep Reinforcement Learning; Lessons We've Learned](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02915/) (2021)
- [Assessing Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.12282/) (2018)
- [Policy Optimization in a Noisy Neighborhood: On Return Landscapes in Continuous Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14597/) (2023)
- [Cliff Diving: Exploring Reward Surfaces in Reinforcement Learning Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07015/) (2022)
- [Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Actor Critic Methods with Applications in Inventory Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.02391/) (2020)
- [Investigating the Impact of Action Representations in Policy Gradient Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06921/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning has proven its power on various occasions. However, its performance is not always guaranteed when system dynamics change. Instead, it largely relies on users' empirical experience. For reinforcement learning algorithms with an actor-critic structure, the critic neural network reflects the approximation and optimization process in the RL algorithm. Analyzing the performance of the critic neural network helps to understand the mechanism of the algorithm. To support systematic interpretation of such algorithms in dynamic control problems, this work proposes a critic match loss landscape visualization method for online reinforcement learning. The method constructs a loss landscape by projecting recorded critic parameter trajectories onto a low-dimensional linear subspace. The critic match loss is evaluated over the projected parameter grid using fixed reference state samples and temporal-difference targets. This yields a three-dimensional loss surface together with a two-dimensional optimization path that characterizes critic learning behavior. To extend analysis beyond visual inspection, quantitative landscape indices and a normalized system performance index are introduced, enabling structured comparison across different training outcomes. The approach is demonstrated using the Action-Dependent Heuristic Dynamic Programming algorithm on cart-pole and spacecraft attitude control tasks. Comparative analyses across projection methods and training stages reveal distinct landscape characteristics associated with stable convergence and unstable learning. The proposed framework enables both qualitative and quantitative interpretation of critic optimization behavior in online reinforcement learning.
