# Suppressing Domain-Specific Hallucination in Construction LLMs: A Knowledge Graph Foundation for GraphRAG and QLoRA on River and Sediment Control Technical Standards

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13307 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.13307/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10997/) (2023)
- [Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11511/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.13138/) (2022)
- [LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13372/) (2024)
- [From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16130/) (2024)
- [Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09687/) (2023)
- [Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08302/) (2023)
- [Active Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06983/) (2023)
- [GaLore: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03507/) (2024)
- [Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15217/) (2023)
- [QA-LoRA: Quantization-Aware Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14717/) (2023)
- [Knowledge Graph Prompting for Multi-Document Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11730/) (2023)
- [Improving the Domain Adaptation of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) Models for Open Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02627/) (2022)
- [Continual Pre-Training for Cross-Lingual LLM Adaptation: Enhancing Japanese Language Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.17790/) (2024)
- [MindMap: Knowledge Graph Prompting Sparks Graph of Thoughts in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09729/) (2023)
- [Enhancing Knowledge Graph Construction Using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04676/) (2023)
- [Building a Large Japanese Web Corpus for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.17733/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Train, Retrieve, or Both? A Four-Arm Head-to-Head for Correct Statutory Citation on the Ontario Residential Tenancies Act](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20359/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper addresses the challenge of answering technical questions derived from Japan's River and Sediment Control Technical Standards -- a multi-volume regulatory document covering survey, planning, design, and maintenance of river levees, dams, and sabo structures -- using open-source large language models running entirely on local hardware. We implement and evaluate three complementary approaches: Case A (plain 20B LLM baseline), Case B (8B LLM with QLoRA domain fine-tuning on 715 graph-derived QA pairs), and Case C (20B LLM augmented with a Neo4j knowledge graph via GraphRAG). All three cases use the Swallow series of Japanese-adapted LLMs and are evaluated on a 100-question benchmark spanning 8 technical categories, judged automatically by an independent LLM (Qwen2.5-14B, score 0--3). The key finding is a performance inversion: the 8B QLoRA fine-tuned model (Case B) achieves a judge average of 2.92/3 -- surpassing both the 20B plain baseline (Case A: 2.29/3, +0.63) and the 20B GraphRAG approach (Case C: 2.62/3, +0.30) -- while running at 3× faster latency (14.2s vs. 42.2s for Case A). GraphRAG provides moderate gains (+0.33 over baseline) but is outperformed by domain-specific fine-tuning in both quality and efficiency. We document the full engineering pipeline, including knowledge graph construction (200 nodes, 268 relations), QLoRA training data generation from Neo4j relations, training on a single GPU (16 GB VRAM) using unsloth, GGUF Q4KM quantisation and Ollama deployment, and the graph retrieval and re-ranking design. High-level engineering lessons are distilled in the main body; implementation pitfalls and toolchain details are documented in Supplementary Materials.