# Test-time RL alignment exposes task familiarity artifacts in LLM benchmarks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12875 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.12875/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 37 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20783/) (2025)
- [s1: Simple test-time scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19393/) (2025)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13837/) (2025)
- [MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12284/) (2023)
- [MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13319/) (2019)
- [SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18892/) (2025)
- [Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01456/) (2025)
- [The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22617/) (2025)
- [OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04178/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Example](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.20571/) (2025)
- [Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14945/) (2025)
- [TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16084/) (2025)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15134/) (2025)
- [Free Process Rewards without Process Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.01981/) (2024)
- [GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19255/) (2024)
- [Orca-Math: Unlocking the potential of SLMs in Grade School Math](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14830/) (2024)
- [LIMR: Less is More for RL Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11886/) (2025)
- [On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05629/) (2025)
- [Learning What Reinforcement Learning Can't: Interleaved Online Fine-Tuning for Hardest Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07527/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Direct evaluation of LLMs on benchmarks can be misleading because comparatively strong performance may reflect task familiarity rather than capability. The train-before-test approach controls for task familiarity by giving each model task-relevant training before evaluation, originally through supervised finetuning. However, suitable training data is often hard to come by, and evaluation results vary with the data chosen. In this paper, we propose a two-stage test-time reinforcement learning (RL) alignment method for train-before-test. First, RL with a single sample provides a first alignment of the model to the task format, and second, test-time RL with majority-voting reward aligns the model to the benchmark distribution. Our test-time RL alignment method aligns similarly well as SFT-based train-before test, but without requiring a task-specific training set. On a domain-specific benchmark without training data, we show that direct evaluation underestimates base models which perform substantially better once aligned, yielding a more faithful evaluation of their capabilities. Moreover, for reasoning tasks, the performance gap between fine-tuned models and their base models largely disappears after alignment, suggesting that many gains from RLVR/SFT reported in the literature are not a difference in reasoning capability, but rather artifacts of task familiarity.