# CoMMET: A Psychologically Grounded Benchmark for Evaluating Theory of Mind in Multimodal LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11915 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.11915/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 13 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM training and visual instruction tuning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-training-and-visual-instruction-tuning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Large Language Models Fail on Trivial Alterations to Theory-of-Mind Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08399/) (2023)
- [FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind in Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15421/) (2023)
- [Clever Hans or Neural Theory of Mind? Stress Testing Social Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14763/) (2023)
- [MMToM-QA: Multimodal Theory of Mind Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08743/) (2024)
- [NegotiationToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind on Negotiation Surrounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13627/) (2024)
- [MuMA-ToM: Multi-modal Multi-Agent Theory of Mind](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.12574/) (2024)
- [ToMChallenges: A Principle-Guided Dataset and Diverse Evaluation Tasks for Exploring Theory of Mind](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15068/) (2023)
- [Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Assessment and Enhancement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00026/) (2025)
- [Theory of Mind abilities of Large Language Models in Human-Robot Interaction : An Illusion?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05302/) (2024)
- [ToMATO: Verbalizing the Mental States of Role-Playing LLMs for Benchmarking Theory of Mind](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.08838/) (2025)
- [Limits of Theory of Mind Modelling in Dialogue-Based Collaborative Plan Acquisition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.12621/) (2024)
- [Mind Your Theory: Theory of Mind Goes Deeper Than Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13631/) (2024)
- [TactfulToM: Do LLMs Have the Theory of Mind Ability to Understand White Lies?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17054/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Theory of Mind (ToM)-the ability to reason about the mental states of oneself and others-is a cornerstone of human social intelligence. As Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) become ubiquitous in real-world applications, validating their capacity for this level of social reasoning is essential for effective and natural interactions. However, existing benchmarks for assessing ToM in MLLMs are limited; most rely solely on text inputs and focus narrowly on belief-related tasks. In this paper, we propose a new multimodal benchmark dataset, CoMMET, a comprehensive mental states and moral evaluation task inspired by the Theory of Mind Booklet Task. CoMMET expands the scope of evaluation by covering a broader range of mental states and introducing multi-turn testing. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first psychology-grounded benchmark to evaluate MLLMs across multiple mental states in a multimodal, open-ended, and multi-turn setting. Through a comprehensive assessment of MLLMs across different families and sizes, we analyze the strengths and limitations of current models and identify directions for future improvement.