# Reference-Guided Machine Unlearning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11210 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.11210/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 34 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Machine unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/safety/machine-unlearning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05820/) (2016)
- [Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03817/) (2019)
- [When Does Label Smoothing Help?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02629/) (2019)
- [Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03570/) (2021)
- [Erasing Concepts from Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07345/) (2023)
- [Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03030/) (2019)
- [SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12508/) (2023)
- [Amnesiac Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.10981/) (2020)
- [A Survey of Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.02299/) (2022)
- [Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02923/) (2020)
- [Unrolling SGD: Understanding Factors Influencing Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.13398/) (2021)
- [Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09880/) (2023)
- [Fast Yet Effective Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.08947/) (2021)
- [Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.04934/) (2023)
- [Can Bad Teaching Induce Forgetting? Unlearning in Deep Networks using an Incompetent Teacher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.08096/) (2022)
- [Fast Machine Unlearning Without Retraining Through Selective Synaptic Dampening](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07707/) (2023)
- [On the Necessity of Auditable Algorithmic Definitions for Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11891/) (2021)
- [Low-Cost High-Power Membership Inference Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03262/) (2023)
- [Towards Adversarial Evaluations for Inexact Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.06640/) (2022)
- [Recommendation Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.06820/) (2022)
- [Are we making progress in unlearning? Findings from the first NeurIPS unlearning competition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09073/) (2024)
- [Meta-Unlearning on Diffusion Models: Preventing Relearning Unlearned Concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12777/) (2024)
- [CURE: Concept Unlearning via Orthogonal Representation Editing in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12677/) (2025)
- [Learning to Unlearn while Retaining: Combating Gradient Conflicts in Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06339/) (2025)
- [Attribute-to-Delete: Machine Unlearning via Datamodel Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.23232/) (2024)
- [An Information Theoretic Approach to Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01401/) (2024)
- [Ascent Fails to Forget](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.26427/) (2025)
- [MUBox: A Critical Evaluation Framework of Deep Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08576/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Models Designed to Forget: Machine Unlearning via Key Deletion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.15033/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Machine unlearning aims to remove the influence of specific training data from a model while preserving its general utility. In vision, many approximate unlearning methods pursue this goal through degradation-based heuristics, such as loss maximization or random labeling. Yet making a model worse on forget samples is not the same as making it behave as if those examples had never been seen: these signals can be poorly conditioned, destabilize optimization, and harm generalization. We argue that approximate unlearning should instead prioritize distributional indistinguishability, aligning the model's predictive behavior on forget data with that on truly unseen data. Motivated by this principle, we propose Reference-Guided Unlearning (ReGUn), a vision unlearning framework that uses disjoint held-out data to construct a principled, class-conditioned reference distribution for distillation. Rather than explicitly degrading predictions on forget examples, ReGUn guides them toward non-member behavior through held-out supervision. Across multiple architectures, natural image datasets, and forget fractions, ReGUn achieves a competitive forgetting--utility trade-off relative to standard approximate baselines while closely matching retrain-like membership inference behavior. As one instantiation of this principle, the results suggest that simple objectives designed around indistinguishability can provide an effective alternative to complex degradation-based unlearning procedures.
