# Adaptive RAN Slicing Control via Reward-Free Self-Finetuning Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10564 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.10564/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agentic AI for wireless networks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 17 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agentic AI for wireless networks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agentic-ai-for-wireless-networks/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Process reward models for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/process-reward-models-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01290/) (2018)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16291/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10144/) (2023)
- [Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12931/) (2023)
- [A Vision of 6G Wireless Systems: Applications, Trends, Technologies, and Open Research Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10265/) (2019)
- [NetLLM: Adapting Large Language Models for Networking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02338/) (2024)
- [6G Wireless Systems: Vision, Requirements, Challenges, Insights, and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.03213/) (2020)
- [AI-Native Network Slicing for 6G Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.08576/) (2021)
- [A Large Language Model-Driven Reward Design Framework via Dynamic Feedback for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14660/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The integration of Generative AI models into AI-native network systems offers a transformative path toward achieving autonomous and adaptive control. However, the application of such models to continuous control tasks is impeded by intrinsic architectural limitations, including finite context windows, the lack of explicit reward signals, and the degradation of the long context. This paper posits that the key to unlocking robust continuous control is enabling agents to internalize experience by distilling it into their parameters, rather than relying on prompt-based memory. To this end, we propose a novel self-finetuning framework that enables agentic systems to learn continuously through direct interaction with the environment, bypassing the need for handcrafted rewards. Our framework implements a bi-perspective reflection mechanism that generates autonomous linguistic feedback to construct preference datasets from interaction history. A subsequent preference-based fine-tuning process distills long-horizon experiences into the model's parameters. We evaluate our approach on a dynamic Radio Access Network (RAN) slicing task, a challenging multi-objective control problem that requires the resolution of acute trade-offs between spectrum efficiency, service quality, and reconfiguration stability under volatile network conditions. Experimental results show that our framework outperforms standard Reinforcement Learning (RL) baselines and existing Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents in sample efficiency, stability, and multi-metric optimization. These findings demonstrate the potential of self-improving generative agents for continuous control tasks, paving the way for future AI-native network infrastructure.